Ancient Aliens: Lost Race of Biblical Giants Uncovered

Messages
297
First we need to define giant...At what height is a person considered a giant..?


Average human height worldwide is 5ft to 5ft 9 in tall.....so do we consider anything above 6 feet a giant?
 

PaulaJedi

Survivor
Zenith
Messages
8,851
First we need to define giant...At what height is a person considered a giant..?


Average human height worldwide is 5ft to 5ft 9 in tall.....so do we consider anything above 6 feet a giant?

I'm sure the average height thousands of years ago was a lot smaller. Look at us now -- we just about consider someone 7 ft tall a giant.

I would like to see some bones, but maybe we aren't digging deep enough.
 

PaulaJedi

Survivor
Zenith
Messages
8,851
The below is a site where 9 foot specimens were found...


Cool, but I wonder why nobody dated these and studied the DNA, or if they did, why is it being hidden? It irks me when mysteries are hidden.
What is so bad about knowing the truth?

Side note: Also in Wisconsin, there is a pyramid underwater in a lake. Apparently, there are more under water elsewhere. (Sort of off topic, but my point is that the giants could have built them).
 
Messages
297
I think humans were responsible for building them....The confusing part is why does everyone think it had to be giants? Or aliens for that matter...What would it be about giants that would make them super human? A bible reference? In order to prove giants built anything there has to be a connection and there is no evidence giants built anything....
 

Mayhem

Senior Member
Zenith
Messages
6,744

Claim​

The Supreme Court ordered the Smithsonian Institution to disclose that it destroyed several giant skeletons in the early 1900s to preserve the mainstream narrative of evolution.

"
A US Supreme Court ruling has forced the Smithsonian institution to release classified papers dating from the early 1900’s that proves the organization was involved in a major historical cover up of evidence showing giants human remains in the tens of thousands had been uncovered all across America and were ordered to be destroyed by high level administrators to protect the mainstream chronology of human evolution at the time.

The allegations stemming from the American Institution of Alternative Archeology (AIAA) that the Smithsonian Institution had destroyed thousands of giant human remains during the early 1900’s was not taken lightly by the Smithsonian who responded by suing the organization for defamation and trying to damage the reputation of the 168-year old institution.

During the court case, new elements were brought to light as several Smithsonian whistle blowers admitted to the existence of documents that allegedly proved the destruction of tens of thousands of human skeletons reaching between 6 feet and 12 feet in height, a reality mainstream archeology can not admit to for different reasons, claims AIAA spokesman, James Churward."

another

'The National Geographic Society has not discovered ancient giant humans, despite rampant reports and pictures.

The hoax began with a doctored photo and later found a receptive online audience — thanks perhaps to the image’s unintended religious connotations.

A digitally altered photograph created in 2002 shows a reclining giant surrounded by a wooden platform — with a shovel-wielding archaeologist thrown in for scale.

By 2004 the “discovery” was being blogged and emailed all over the world — “Giant Skeleton Unearthed!” — and it’s been enjoying a revival in 2007.'

 

PaulaJedi

Survivor
Zenith
Messages
8,851
I think humans were responsible for building them....The confusing part is why does everyone think it had to be giants? Or aliens for that matter...What would it be about giants that would make them super human? A bible reference? In order to prove giants built anything there has to be a connection and there is no evidence giants built anything....

Some believe the blocks are too heavy to be moved without modern technology, so the thought is a giant would big enough and strong enough to move them, but they would have to be pretty darn big. lol
 

PaulaJedi

Survivor
Zenith
Messages
8,851

Claim​

The Supreme Court ordered the Smithsonian Institution to disclose that it destroyed several giant skeletons in the early 1900s to preserve the mainstream narrative of evolution.

"
A US Supreme Court ruling has forced the Smithsonian institution to release classified papers dating from the early 1900’s that proves the organization was involved in a major historical cover up of evidence showing giants human remains in the tens of thousands had been uncovered all across America and were ordered to be destroyed by high level administrators to protect the mainstream chronology of human evolution at the time.

The allegations stemming from the American Institution of Alternative Archeology (AIAA) that the Smithsonian Institution had destroyed thousands of giant human remains during the early 1900’s was not taken lightly by the Smithsonian who responded by suing the organization for defamation and trying to damage the reputation of the 168-year old institution.

During the court case, new elements were brought to light as several Smithsonian whistle blowers admitted to the existence of documents that allegedly proved the destruction of tens of thousands of human skeletons reaching between 6 feet and 12 feet in height, a reality mainstream archeology can not admit to for different reasons, claims AIAA spokesman, James Churward."

another

'The National Geographic Society has not discovered ancient giant humans, despite rampant reports and pictures.

The hoax began with a doctored photo and later found a receptive online audience — thanks perhaps to the image’s unintended religious connotations.

A digitally altered photograph created in 2002 shows a reclining giant surrounded by a wooden platform — with a shovel-wielding archaeologist thrown in for scale.

By 2004 the “discovery” was being blogged and emailed all over the world — “Giant Skeleton Unearthed!” — and it’s been enjoying a revival in 2007.'


We could try to look up the alleged court case.
 

Top