TimeFlipper
Senior Member
- Messages
- 13,705
Could M87 Black Hole Image Be Wrong?...New Study Suggests Image Maybe Wrong!
- Thread starter TimeFlipper
- Start date
Beholder
Senior Member
- Messages
- 1,025
Research papers are full of bias and overfitting, bending conclusions to get more money. They should train the method on blurry images of well known subjects, then take new pictures of the black hole reconstructed without knowing what it is.
Fast fourier transforms in Python is actually beginner stuff taught in image analysis courses. Difference mapping is just to subtract one image from another to get rid of the background noise. Shape fitting assumes that one knows the type of shape, because it only approximates parameters and coefficients of your shape.
Fast fourier transforms in Python is actually beginner stuff taught in image analysis courses. Difference mapping is just to subtract one image from another to get rid of the background noise. Shape fitting assumes that one knows the type of shape, because it only approximates parameters and coefficients of your shape.
Last edited:
Einstein
Temporal Engineer
- Messages
- 5,399
It was a computer generated image from the start. So it was make believe from the start. All based on the belief that black holes are real. Without any factual base to any of it.
- Messages
- 8,542
NASA (or whomever) creates a dubious platform for themselves
utilizing these 'pictures'. Imho.
Blurred 'Evidence'.
I've come to expect better from NASA.
YMMV
utilizing these 'pictures'. Imho.
Blurred 'Evidence'.
I've come to expect better from NASA.
YMMV