Unintentional
Active Member
Farenheit 9-11
I am a BIG Michael Moore fan, or I should say WAS. I have seen all his movies and read all his books. I liked them. I had no problem with them. They were entertaining and factual as far as I knew. He got booed at the Oscars and I thought, hey, that's his opinion, how dare you boo him!
This movie 9-11 is very disappointing. I expected a lot more from Michael Moore. He has said in his books that he doesn't like making movies or books. I think maybe that is what went wrong with this one.
1. It wasn't funny
2. It is chuck full of lies and half truths. Some statements are outright lies, some are distorted, and some are half truths. Now, in the past when there is an outright lie in one of his movies, he "documents" via film the person saying it, but in this film many of the lies are from his narration, so it left me perplexed why he would say such a thing.
3. Its even racist. A good portion of the criticism comes from Bush being good friends with the House of Saud. Apparently MM thinks that because most of the highjackers were Saudi, we are not allowed to have friends with the Sauds. That is like saying because a white guy stole my car, no one should have any white friends. :blink:
4. There was nothing new in this movie. If you even keep a mediocre attempt at keeping up with the news, there will be no shockers here. This movie is clearly aimed at the clueless, because anyone else would reject it in almost its entirety.
Another thing, if you saw the previews and liked how MM attacked the Patriot Act in the previews, the entire scene and all mentions of the patriot have been striped from the movie. That scene shown in the preview is NOT in the movie. No Chuck Rangel, no MM driving around in a panel truck broadcasting, "All legislatures who want me to read the patriot act to them please come here." Even his preview is a lie, because it does not preview the movie. There are also no prison abuse scenes in the movie either as hinted at in some interviews.
It is not for me to say you should or shouldn't see it. You can make up your own mind. It does make me really wonder why France gave it the Cannes File Award, and then I thought...oh...France. It either won there because the people who saw it are severely undereducated about current events or they just liked the way it attacked Bush.
I don't even see how someone who didn't like Bush would like this film. If you have a beef with the current administration, don't you want your criticisms to be factually based? This movie as a whole is as intelligent as a criticism as someone calling someone else a "poopy" head. (My 3 year old's favorite criticism of people he doesn't like.)
All in all, very disappointing.
(no rose on this one)
Time Travel Forum
I am a BIG Michael Moore fan, or I should say WAS. I have seen all his movies and read all his books. I liked them. I had no problem with them. They were entertaining and factual as far as I knew. He got booed at the Oscars and I thought, hey, that's his opinion, how dare you boo him!
This movie 9-11 is very disappointing. I expected a lot more from Michael Moore. He has said in his books that he doesn't like making movies or books. I think maybe that is what went wrong with this one.
1. It wasn't funny

2. It is chuck full of lies and half truths. Some statements are outright lies, some are distorted, and some are half truths. Now, in the past when there is an outright lie in one of his movies, he "documents" via film the person saying it, but in this film many of the lies are from his narration, so it left me perplexed why he would say such a thing.

3. Its even racist. A good portion of the criticism comes from Bush being good friends with the House of Saud. Apparently MM thinks that because most of the highjackers were Saudi, we are not allowed to have friends with the Sauds. That is like saying because a white guy stole my car, no one should have any white friends. :blink:
4. There was nothing new in this movie. If you even keep a mediocre attempt at keeping up with the news, there will be no shockers here. This movie is clearly aimed at the clueless, because anyone else would reject it in almost its entirety.
Another thing, if you saw the previews and liked how MM attacked the Patriot Act in the previews, the entire scene and all mentions of the patriot have been striped from the movie. That scene shown in the preview is NOT in the movie. No Chuck Rangel, no MM driving around in a panel truck broadcasting, "All legislatures who want me to read the patriot act to them please come here." Even his preview is a lie, because it does not preview the movie. There are also no prison abuse scenes in the movie either as hinted at in some interviews.
It is not for me to say you should or shouldn't see it. You can make up your own mind. It does make me really wonder why France gave it the Cannes File Award, and then I thought...oh...France. It either won there because the people who saw it are severely undereducated about current events or they just liked the way it attacked Bush.
I don't even see how someone who didn't like Bush would like this film. If you have a beef with the current administration, don't you want your criticisms to be factually based? This movie as a whole is as intelligent as a criticism as someone calling someone else a "poopy" head. (My 3 year old's favorite criticism of people he doesn't like.)
All in all, very disappointing.

(no rose on this one)
Time Travel Forum