Flat-Earth

[Kairos]

You can literally bounce lasers off the mirrors left behind by Apollo astronauts..

 

[Dr. Malasunto]

You can literally bounce lasers off the mirrors left behind by Apollo astronauts..

It seems really cool!

 

[titorite]

You can literally bounce lasers off the mirrors left behind by Apollo astronauts..

Fun fact you can bounce a laser off nearly any spot on the moon. The mirror stuff is baloney , the moon is highly reflective. It doesn't emit its own light.





It's like this, No blast crater from a rocket deceleration descent, No moon dust over the gold landing pads from the impact or rocket blast blowback, no skid marks in the sand from an object with forward moving momentum , Almost as if it were placed there. And thats just the problems with tranquility base and eagle one. NASA fakes things... NASA fakes things like crazy a great deal of our black budget is washed through NASA. That doesn't make the earth flat. MATH PROVES THE EARTH IS ROUND to say nothing of seasons or horizons. Like wise , actions have reactions. A rocket deceleration would leave a crater. The spider module never worked on earth. Why would a ration person assume it magically decided to work on the moon? Because it was on TV and repeated over and over again? Repetition of a thing does not make a thing a fact

 

[Kairos]

Fun fact: only one of us has a background in science and engineering, and I am pretty sure it's not you.

 

[Negan]

Fun fact: The original intention of that lunar mirror was so that Dr. Evil could disintegrate anyone, anywhere by bouncing his disintegration laser off the moon instead of using expensive satellites (or "space mirrors" as he put it).

 

[Kairos]

Fun fact: that is exactly how we are going to eliminate degenerates and make America great again.

 

[Kairos]

If you just point the laser at any random point on the Moon, the light scatters. It only bounces back when you manage to target one of the reflectors.

 

[titorite]

Fun Fact: everybody loves to pretend that they are scientists and engineers on paranormal and conspiracy sites.

Their still aint no blast crater underneath that lander and for all that forward moving momentum those lander pads didn't drag one speck on lunar dust nor did they get any dust on themselves. It just gently placed itself down. But hey im sure belittling observations is a very scientific way of refuting things scientifically.

 

[Dr. Malasunto]

Fun fact you can bounce a laser off nearly any spot on the moon. The mirror stuff is baloney , the moon is highly reflective. It doesn't emit its own light.


View attachment 7284


It's like this, No blast crater from a rocket deceleration descent, No moon dust over the gold landing pads from the impact or rocket blast blowback, no skid marks in the sand from an object with forward moving momentum , Almost as if it were placed there. And thats just the problems with tranquility base and eagle one. NASA fakes things... NASA fakes things like crazy a great deal of our black budget is washed through NASA. That doesn't make the earth flat. MATH PROVES THE EARTH IS ROUND to say nothing of seasons or horizons. Like wise , actions have reactions. A rocket deceleration would leave a crater. The spider module never worked on earth. Why would a ration person assume it magically decided to work on the moon? Because it was on TV and repeated over and over again? Repetition of a thing does not make a thing a fact

I also believe that NASA fakes things. But i think we were two times on the moon.

 

[nickrulercreator]

Fun fact you can bounce a laser off nearly any spot on the moon. The mirror stuff is baloney , the moon is highly reflective.

Except there's a difference between the amount of photons received from bouncing it off any place on the surface, and where the lasers are.

No blast crater from a rocket deceleration descent

There shouldn't be any. It comes down to simple math. The LM's descent engine was 54 inches across (source). It had a maximum thrust of 10,000 lbf, but at the final part of the landing it was reduced to 3,000 lbf. A circle 54in across has a surface area of 2,300 sq. in. 3000/2300 is about 1.5psi of force. Your footprint exerts more force on the surface of the Earth than the LM's descent engine did onto the Lunar surface. Furthermore, gasses expand in a vacuum, meaning they decrease in pressure even more. The LM's descent engine never touched the lunar surface and actually stopped a few feet above the surface, so by the time the gasses from the engine hit the surface, they were powerful enough to blow dust away (which can be seen in up-close photos), but not make any crater.

No moon dust over the gold landing pads from the impact or rocket blast blowback

There shouldn't be any dust on the pads. On Earth, dust billows thanks to the atmosphere, but in a vacuum environment (such as the Moon), dust doesn't billow. Instead, objects travel in an unbroken arc-shaped path (gravity causes the arc). The dust, as it was blown away by the engine, shot out sideways or up and away from the LM. No dust was able to billow and remain around the LM, as there was no vacuum.

no skid marks in the sand from an object with forward moving momentum , Almost as if it were placed there

Are you talking about the LM? Why would it have forward-moving momentum? It landed coming straight down. It didn't hit the surface with horizontal velocity.

NASA fakes things... NASA fakes things like crazy

Evidence? I've never seen one claim of NASA fakery stand up to scrutiny.

great deal of our black budget is washed through NASA.

Evidence? NASA only gets $19billion in the Federal budget. That's next to nothing compared to the entire budget.

Like wise , actions have reactions. A rocket deceleration would leave a crater.

Only if the force of the engine's exhaust was powerful enough. If it wasn't, it'd blow away dust, but it would never dig into the surface.

The spider module never worked on earth.

According to whom? The LM was never designed to land on Earth, or work in an atmosphere, so why should it work on Earth? They tested the thing prior to launch, obviously, but they never tested it to fly on Earth. It would never get off the ground, Earth's gravity is too strong. That's what Apollos 9 and 10 were for though. A9 tested the LM in Earth orbit, and A10 took it to the Moon for the first time.

Why would a ration person assume it magically decided to work on the moon?

Because that's what it was designed to do. It was tested to make sure each component worked, especially the landing legs, on Earth. They'd drop the LM while simulating 1/6g on Earth to see if the LM could withstand the impact, and it did. Then the whole thing was tested in space on Apollo 9, then it was seen if the whole thing could go through the landing sequence (without actually landing) on Apollo 10.

Because it was on TV and repeated over and over again? Repetition of a thing does not make a thing a fact

Of course not, but the evidence does.