🧪 Project Gravity Defied: Propellantless Propulsion Invented (DARPA)

Noah_A_S

Noah_A_S

Member
In a record-setting shock and awe-inducing breakthrough, propellantless propulsion might be just around the corner.

Gravity Modification Technology requires a Unified Field Theory of EM and Gravity. And it looks like scientists at The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) might have found the key to unlocking it, published in a research paper found on ResearchGate entitled "Gravity Modification Experiment Description and Results (presented at APEC Propulsion Conference 8/31/24)" Gravity Modification from Unified Field Theory seems closer to reality than science fiction.

As seen here: APEC 8/31: GEM & Threshold Theory, Michelson-Morley & BioGraphene - Alternative Propulsion Engineering Conference


Mario Nawfal on Twitter/x reports the following:
"🚨GRAVITY DEFIED: SCIENTIST CLAIMS BREAKTHROUGH IN ELECTROMAGNETIC LEVITATION

In a potentially groundbreaking announcement, plasma physicist Dr. John Brandenburg reports successful laboratory demonstrations of gravity modification using electromagnetic fields.

This remarkable claim could revolutionize our understanding of physics and open up unprecedented possibilities for space travel and technology.

Brandenburg's experiments, based on his GEM (Gravity-Electro-Magnetism) Unified Field Theory, range from simple demonstrations with helium balloons to more complex setups using 3-phase power.

The most striking result reportedly showed a 150 mg weight loss in a coil suspended from a sensitive load cell.

The significance of this announcement cannot be overstated.

If Brandenburg's findings are confirmed, they would represent the first laboratory demonstration of controlled gravity modification.

Such a capability could lead to revolutionary propulsion systems, making interplanetary travel more feasible, and potentially transforming industries on Earth.

Brandenburg's work offers a tantalizing glimpse into a future where the fundamental forces of nature might be manipulated, potentially ushering in a new era of scientific and technological advancement.

Source:
@PhdBrandenburg"
Click to expand...
PSA: I might also go on record stating that in the case of Amy Eskridge, who died in 2022 after publicly announcing that gravity had been cracked, independently, at least 5 other times, by researchers at other agencies, you might find it well, that Dr. John Brandenburg, the scientist in question, seems happy, healthy, and not wanting to commit suicide.
 
I see a lot of these science articles lately. But every single one of them is all bark, no bite.

The only thing I've seen with promise is the lifter experimental devices. And then someone comes along and uses the term "Asymmetrical Capacitor" in an attempt to confuse us into believing another cockamamie story. It seems no one is willing to use actual scientific fact anymore. The fact being that a monopole will move in a bipolar field towards its polar opposite. This fact works with both electric and magnetic phenomena.

I'm betting with that basic knowledge that something very similar is how we begin to understand gravity propulsion.
 

Einstein said:
I see a lot of these science articles lately. But every single one of them is all bark, no bite.

The only thing I've seen with promise is the lifter experimental devices. And then someone comes along and uses the term "Asymmetrical Capacitor" in an attempt to confuse us into believing another cockamamie story. It seems no one is willing to use actual scientific fact anymore. The fact being that a monopole will move in a bipolar field towards its polar opposite. This fact works with both electric and magnetic phenomena.

I'm betting with that basic knowledge that something very similar is how we begin to understand gravity propulsion.
Click to expand...
Did you see the post I write at the end about how he seems healthy and unwilling to commit suicide?

We might want to pay attention to that, in case anyone in the future claims he suicides.

I don't think he will.

As for the whole things about it being cockamamie theory with all bark and zero bite, I think it's important to recognize:

1. That people have been killed in order to silence them from release this kind of technology to the public
2. There is actual research posted to scientific journals on discoveries such as this.
 

Noah_A_S said:
Did you see the post I write at the end about how he seems healthy and unwilling to commit suicide?

We might want to pay attention to that, in case anyone in the future claims he suicides.

I don't think he will.

As for the whole things about it being cockamamie theory with all bark and zero bite, I think it's important to recognize:

1. That people have been killed in order to silence them from release this kind of technology to the public
2. There is actual research posted to scientific journals on discoveries such as this.
Click to expand...

Yes! I did see that. This technology is being suppressed and no one is taking credit for the suppression.

Yet not one article tells you anything of substance that would enable you to even understand what they claim.

Even you seemed to skim over the facts I presented. Perhaps that is your goal too. To continue with the suppression.
 
Einstein said:
Yes! I did see that. This technology is being suppressed and no one is taking credit for the suppression.

Yet not one article tells you anything of substance that would enable you to even understand what they claim.

Even you seemed to skim over the facts I presented. Perhaps that is your goal too. To continue with the suppression.
Click to expand...
No @Einstein I can assure you that I definitely want you know the truth about everything, and that I also want the technology that is being suppressed, to be released, the same as you do.

I am not a payed bad actor, and I want to know the truth, much the same as you.

I think we are in the same boat, and I absolutely hate that we don't have the technology and truth that is being suppressed from us.

And we don't even know why.
 
Einstein said:
I see a lot of these science articles lately. But every single one of them is all bark, no bite.

The only thing I've seen with promise is the lifter experimental devices. And then someone comes along and uses the term "Asymmetrical Capacitor" in an attempt to confuse us into believing another cockamamie story. It seems no one is willing to use actual scientific fact anymore. The fact being that a monopole will move in a bipolar field towards its polar opposite. This fact works with both electric and magnetic phenomena.

I'm betting with that basic knowledge that something very similar is how we begin to understand gravity propulsion.
Click to expand...
I agree the way to go seems to be the way of ionic lifters, however they are stupidly inefficient in their current configurations.
There has to be a way of improving that, whether it's talking in terms of tens of thousands of volts or something else, I'm guessing red mercury spun at near light speed inside some kind of magnetically shielded tube generates that kind of electricity supply.
But its far beyond the average tinkerers potential.
I have however seen 70,000 volt spark gaps made pretty easily though with multiple series of capacitors and I think it was fly back transformers in series...can't recall too much. Maybe theres a way to regular that discharge???
 
8thsinner said:
I agree the way to go seems to be the way of ionic lifters, however they are stupidly inefficient in their current configurations.
There has to be a way of improving that, whether it's talking in terms of tens of thousands of volts or something else, I'm guessing red mercury spun at near light speed inside some kind of magnetically shielded tube generates that kind of electricity supply.
But its far beyond the average tinkerers potential.
I have however seen 70,000 volt spark gaps made pretty easily though with multiple series of capacitors and I think it was fly back transformers in series...can't recall too much. Maybe theres a way to regular that discharge???
Click to expand...

The lifter works the same way as an electron moving in a bipolar electric field. Just remember that the Earth's atmosphere voltage potential is exactly like a bipolar electric field. The lifter is just behaving like an electron with higher voltage potential. But electrons are not connected to gravitational weight.

There is another toy that uses a similar principal with magnetic fields instead. Recall the AA battery with magnets on each terminal propelling itself through a long coil of wire. The magnets are configured so that the same pole points towards the battery. A simulated magnetic monopole. Inside the long wire coil, a current is generated producing a bipolar magnetic field. An observed propulsion affect is observed. I like this better because the permanent magnets are connected to the objects weight. And the electromagnet is only connected to electron weight. That field produced exists in space. You have already seen the gadget I made using electromagnets and a permanent magnet.
 
A large plate capacitor with high voltage applied to it has been shown to lose a tiny amount of weight. Some have mentioned it is more with asymmetrical plates. I don't think this is gravity manipulation but more along the lines of static electric field thrust... kinda like Ein was mentioning and kinda in line with lifters. These are kinda pricey to build, but within the realm of DIY (at least up to a point). I'm kinda surprised there haven't been more tests done. Some have made the claims that this is how certain kinds of UFO's work.
 
I'm trying to get through parts of that long 6h video...

John Brandenburg set up a simple test of electrically "rotating the aether" using the rotor removed from a 3 phase motor. No parts of the disembodied motor rotated, just the 3 phase electric field. It did lose a little bit of weight that was consistent. This is somewhat consistent with what I've read before. He used the Bernoulli equations as they relate to a helicopter to explain the weight loss. He called it a "vacuum Bernoulli equation" since no air was moving.
 
MODAT7 said:
I'm trying to get through parts of that long 6h video...

John Brandenburg set up a simple test of electrically "rotating the aether" using the rotor removed from a 3 phase motor. No parts of the disembodied motor rotated, just the 3 phase electric field. It did lose a little bit of weight that was consistent. This is somewhat consistent with what I've read before. He used the Bernoulli equations as they relate to a helicopter to explain the weight loss. He called it a "vacuum Bernoulli equation" since no air was moving.
Click to expand...
Awesome! I wasn't sure that anyone would be willing to watch that video, in its entirety.

But it's awesome that someone wants to. Thank you!
 

Top