SinisterThinking
Junior Member
- Messages
- 73
and that warping allows for potential travel to the past.
Traveling to a different point in space is not traveling into the past because that is your future. If one can "travel back in time" instead of traveling to the same point in space, but traveling backwards in time needs a cause to be able to do that. A timeline reasembling itself to use that directional chain of logic physically requires a bigger thing surrounding the timeline or more compressed within and or without using those concepts. For that to occur an larger or more compressed amount of mass is required possibly to cause that to occur, infinitely, in which there is no end to the amount of things required to achieve that, and because of that there is no beginning to when it starts. Lost my train of thought, not surprising though, with this level of syntax.I didn't know there was a quiz to get in. Assuming that you are using a python interpreter(assumed by the "def" keyword. Your function definition won't do anything until it's called (presumed by i()). Given that you actually called function i we can assume that , def i(): x = input(), print(x), i(), will output x to the screen(whatever is accepted by the input line x=input(x).
For future reference computer science isn't about scripting in an interpreted language. That is merely a screwdriver in a giant box of tools. Given one more gander at it, it probably will produce a traceback error upon execution.
The relationship of time/space suggests that time travel can occur because time is not a linear function related to space. If that isn't true then we must assume that you can only travel to the future because you were unable to make the decision to travel in time until this exact moment. So you can look at time like the petals of an Iris, meaning the further time (the petals) expand the closer it becomes to points of time(stem) in the past.
Regarding your other statement. It took a created thing to postulate that matter can't be created or destroyed. Although I would argue that the intent of the postulate is that mass, not matter can be neither created or destroyed. But it's been a while since I had Physics 1. The reality is in the construct of energy. You can create and destroy matter all day as long as there is no net gain/loss of energy.
Time lines only exist because there are people to measure the change in them. If you took a spider and cast it in a paper weight. Let it sit for 5 years, then broke it from the mold, will time have changed the spider? No. Without the ability to measure noticeable change, there is no way of knowing the passage of time.
Thanks for the fun! I hope you grade on a curve!
what you perceive internally and potentially externally, the only accurate measure so far of the present that I know of is thought. Which is the only potentially objective way to measure time for you, as the present is probally different per consciousnes.hello . Do you know what is the present ?
metaphorical? structure, fragment, understanding, started so, cell? not part of onethe question was for the tech guy also as a welcoming to the forum . but now it started so ... people consider cells the principal functional structures of a living being ... now I have two questions ... what fragment of a second is relevant to you ? and to a cell ?
prove that I thought it. correct for physical process's. But if consciousness where a physical process it would not exist in the present like a row of dominoes would not be in sync therefore never able to form anything other then a physical process. Hence thought is the only present you have, if thought did not exist in your subjective present then the thoughts would always be in the past therefore never in present therefore would not exist. prove that I am a puppet controlled by my subconscious, I trained for years not be that type. Aren't you what you are claiming I am if you think that your interpetations of words is how the other people interpete them, and never said I did not agree.you know why I am asking these ? because you and everyone else consider the present something else ... you say " I am writing this sentence" and consider it as "Now" "I am writting this sentence".
you are wrong because the time of the sentence starts from I and finish with ....e . So that sentence you wrote it is a continuum of transitory "instants"... consider each letter "x" fraction of a second relevant to the universe ... so you can't call present all the phrase because letter by letter you skipped "your present" ... So when you send it to someone "I am writting this sentence" the other guy understands it as present but actually it was past so there is a sort of misplacement . every action is transitory at the moment between future and past , because you are unconscious and don't care of what happen for example in nanoseconds but while you were writting the sentence a "cell" of your body could have died in the "pause" your fingers take to write two different letters in your keyboard . But it is relevant to the universe for example . The moral of the story is "you can't catch the present" cit Noone