The dumb-down principle or why subsequent generations don't get it

lamdo263

Senior Member
Messages
1,949
It is not my venture here in this web, to start a socially classed series of arguments. However the more recent generations, seem to have an opinion that government has a faucet tap, that once your turn that tap to on, that money flow endlessly our of that faucet.

In the generations starting in the 1980s, believed to a certain extent, that parents were more or less irrelevant, could at times be disregarded, because cell phones, networks of other friends and family like people held within those networks, could take the place of the parents.

As time went on, there was eve a society that came out of some of these computer dependent cultures, that thought if they could demonetized their former parents, then the flow of money from the magic faucet, would come more to them and not the target values of what came to be known as the Cancel Culture.

What is warned against in time to come, if that people we know now, become so dependent upon artificial parents, that there are two group[s formed. As told by writer H.G. Wells, one was referred to as the Eloy and the other, the Morlocks. I'm very sure that they are correct in this estimation as shown in the video link.. To be short, they end up eat each other.

In one or two disattended generations, all family structure depended based in close family ties, could markedly degraded to the point to where once family oriented people would not recognize it.

 

lamdo263

Senior Member
Messages
1,949
One thing that I wanted to add, is that it may be from post effects from the pandemics, we're currently going through, that fashion the subsequent generations in a bio-geneto degratory way. In other o words, these changes would not be termed as spontogenisouly, via their natures. In other words of saying it, someone's cooking the the genetic character that shape personalities cooking pot.

However note, that this effect would be to the so may power exponents, as held in forwards time. Oh my H.G. Wells appears to have been correct, all along.
 

lamdo263

Senior Member
Messages
1,949
* A necessary term in order to understand this thread. Mono-, or near mono, meaning tight controlling groups are what post normal societies were. This would be in the example Jake, Mike, Tim and Pete, were friends and hung around with each other when they went to school. Mike and Ted were religious, would at times go fishing or hunting with their fathers,. love their mothers, followed some sports. They were also respectful, but not always necessarily nioce to the senior people who lived in their neighborhoods.

Mike had a paper delivery route, while both Tim and Pete worked at the Fun Arcade, as attendants there. This type of social setup, just only telling about the males, was good up till the 1960s of mid 1960s.Remember when the social era goes into the years 1985, everything socio-technical starts to change, as there's little reason for the guys to hang out with one another.

After year 2015 society started to drastically change, due to the enforcement of money can bring one, a lot of the items a person could want or need. But in some cases spending time with dad or mothers, does not seem for some of a technical-social nature to be a essentially be necessary any long. However there are still young who hang onto associations with mom and dad, for the development of how dad and mom knew how to make a family. At 2015 on, cell phones, laptops ad other devices, became very, very common.

It seemed that were a buddy buddy type of relationships once were the normal thing to do, that people now are more interspersed with devices that somehow unevolved the need for more solid interpersonal relationships. This is only a rough graphic comparison of family structure.

Multi-monopole societies, were in a way delineated from the royalty factors. While a divergent wanted to split up society, due to electronic devices, seems the now pandemic way to get along.
 


Top