Time Traveler Brought Back This Photo From 2118

[ApexTV]

Alexander Smith claims he is a time traveler that has been to the year 2118. In this video, he showed us an actual picture from the future. He says he was part of a top secret program in which he was one of the first people t ever time travel. What do you think? Is Alexander Smith a real time traveler?

 

[lamdo263]

Alexander Smith claims he is a time traveler that has been to the year 2118. In this video, he showed us an actual picture from the future. He says he was part of a top secret program in which he was one of the first people t ever time travel. What do you think? Is Alexander Smith a real time traveler?

It may be on the type of camera, if he switched it to digital create or augment mode? You aren't allowed to take a direct picture facsimile of an object from the future, as this has an effect like dragging a paddle in the water while another is paddling a canoe. This act throws the entire timeline off, if the picture does not self erase. What usually occurs, is the pre-double indemnity clause as the timeline itself, knows that it's being interfered with and will white the picture out.

However, if one has a type of camera that creates by its own talents, a reasonable reproduction of that timeline object, which is not exact, the timeline may, or may not allow the picture to be taken?

If a time cop sees you in the act of taking a picture, he will confiscate the camera on the odd chance that it may take. This is highly frowned upon by time cops and they don't like this.

Examples are the Billy Meier time traveling to the era of the dinosaurs, were really artistic pictures, which were passed off as photographs. However current timeline photographs taken by Billy, were said to be actual.

A timeline picture that stays together creates event confusion pressure within a timeline. This is sort of like that particular period of time in the timeline experiencing a nervous breakdown and sometimes events are double-tripped in adjoining neighboring timelines. Or an object will be tossed out. Such as a car of a manufacture that nobodies ever heard of, in a parking lot the next day after the timeline casting out event.

This type of happening differs from an event cause to where gravity waves pass over a buried meteorite, to where time travel, or a dislocation of original timeline occurs. Such as occurrences in the New Jersey Triangle.

 

[ApexTV]

It may be on the type of camera, if he switched it to digital create or augment mode? You aren't allowed to take a direct picture facsimile of an object from the future, as this has an effect like dragging a paddle in the water while another is paddling a canoe. This act throws the entire timeline off, if the picture does not self erase. What usually occurs, is the pre-double indemnity clause as the timeline itself, knows that it's being interfered with and will white the picture out.

However, if one has a type of camera that creates by its own talents, a reasonable reproduction of that timeline object, which is not exact, the timeline may, or may not allow the picture to be taken?

If a time cop sees you in the act of taking a picture, he will confiscate the camera on the odd chance that it may take. This is highly frowned upon by time cops and they don't like this.

Examples are the Billy Meier time traveling to the era of the dinosaurs, were really artistic pictures, which were passed off as photographs. However current timeline photographs taken by Billy, were said to be actual.

A timeline picture that stays together creates event confusion pressure within a timeline. This is sort of like that particular period of time in the timeline experiencing a nervous breakdown and sometimes events are double-tripped in adjoining neighboring timelines. Or an object will be tossed out. Such as a car of a manufacture that nobodies ever heard of, in a parking lot the next day after the timeline casting out event.

This type of happening differs from an event cause to where gravity waves pass over a buried meteorite, to where time travel, or a dislocation of original timeline occurs. Such as occurrences in the New Jersey Triangle.

He said he made a copy of the photo in 1981 before returning to the C I A where the took the original copy.

 

[lamdo263]

He said he made a copy of the photo in 1981 before returning to the C I A where the took the original copy.

You can do this as an illustration but not a copy of the original. Same effect, Must be an illustration. If it's a copy of a photo, this still enact the double indemnity clause and the copy of the original will turn white or a real, not imagined time cop will show up at your door.