Debate why are people still taking John Titor seriously?

Sam Slagg

Member
Messages
273
Just because"Titor" is a hoax does not mean time travel is not possible. Also, everyone knows that "Jesus" will be riding a butterfly when he "returns."
Yes, turkeys didn't exist back then. If you don't believe me, ask him yourself...
Word on the street is that he got a haircut , a shave and a tattoo that says "Mean People Suck." No more wearing dresses either as he feels it sends the wrong message to the gay community. Should be interesting....
 

AAA

Member
Messages
469
I am not rejecting anything. It was a legitimate question. I am more than happy to try to help if I can.

Please do not insult my intelligence. I was clear in stating that it was a group of PEOPLE. If you're not up to the task, if you cannot get beyond the ridicule and actually approach this with critical reasoning, if you are not interested, then just say so. I am sure someone else will.

But understand that time travel may not necessarily be the only solution.

I am sure of it. Time travel (in a realistic sense) is only part of it.

Read through some of my posts. You can see that I am thinking and not merely speculating based on what is convenient.

You see, for me, this is not simply about deciding whether or not to believe. It is about discerning truth, addressing deeper questions that go far beyond the normal perspective of what people view as the Titor saga. It has directly effected my life for years, and in regard to things that are much bigger than I am letting onto at this current juncture. We haven't even begun to scratch the surface.
 

Sam Slagg

Member
Messages
273
I haven't seen any to insult as yet. Plus, I'm not interested in insulting you. You said little people and those are the little people I am familiar with. Perhaps when you are finished being annoyed by me you will stop with all the mystery "Moriarty" and start splaining what the Sam slagg you're talking about. If this is an attempt to legitimize the "Titor" hoax, then yes, it will be a waste of time. I started another thread concerning this cover story theory if you care to enlighten the rest of us.
 

TuesdayMcBob

Junior Member
Messages
34
Concerning the time travel aspect of this debate, how can you, personally, prove that time travel will never exist? How about in 1000 years? Do you know how advanced science and technology will be by then? Scientists already state that there is nothing in Physics preventing time travel, meaning that it isn't obsurd. It is only a matter of time before someone figures it out. This means that time travelers from all over the universe could be visiting us. This is what makes the Titor story believable. No hoaxer has developed a story so intricately as Titor has. The hoaxers stop after a few days because of all the questions. If Titor is a hoax, it was done by some very smart people. Yes. People. He definitely was a team.

IMHO.

No one can deny that time travel doesn't exist with any certainty and everyone here knows it. that isn't the debate here.

I don't think Titor was a team.
I think it was preconceived. It was a book.
It was written before posting. It was read and reread before posting.
Its more plausible to me that it was written by one fellow instead of a team.
The simpler answer.. Titor has/had delusions of time travel.
It explains why he kept it up for as long as he did. Because he you know... believed it.
 

Ren

Senior Member
Messages
1,088
Everyone. John Titor is not who you think he is.

Romulus and Jesus have the same rising to heaven story, discovered by Richard Miller.

From this comparison, we have discovered that Saint Luke is Lucius Plutarchus, the Greek scribe of Titus Flavius Caesar. The Jewish scribe was Josephus Flavius. We know who wrote the New Testament.

Josephus mentions Jesus 13 times with different names that refer to the same guy. Izates II Monobaz, the friend and rival of Josephus. Josephus was a Herod and Izates was married to his relative Drusilla Herod.

So while many people in the world are cryring that we can never know who the historical Jesus was, I'm telling you that we know who Jesus was and here are 20 proven reasons why.

We will know who John Titor is too. Just wait.

John W. Loftus at 1/25/2012

"TABLE 1
THE TRANSLATIONS OF ROMULUS AND JESUS COMPARED

Mimetic Signal with References

1 Missing body.
Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Ant. rom.
2.56.2-6; Plutarch, Rom. 27.3-5; Matt
28:11-14; Mark 16:6; Luke 24:3;
John 20:2-10

2 Prodigies.
Livy 1.16.1; Ovid, Metam. 14.816-17;
Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Ant. rom.
2.56.2-6; Plutarch, Rom. 27.6-7; Matt
27:51-54; Mark 15:38; Luke 23:45

3 Darkness over the land.
Ovid, Metam. 14.816-22; Dionysius of
Halicarnassus, Ant. rom. 2.56.2-6;
Plutarch, Rom. 27.6-7; Matt 27:45;
Mark 15:33; Luke 23:44

4 Mountaintop speech.
Ovid, Metam. 14.820-24; Matt 28:18-20

5 Great commission.
Livy 1.16.7; Ovid, Metam. 14.811, 815;
Ovid, Fasti 2.475-511; Plutarch, Rom.
28.2; Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Ant.
rom. 2.63.4; Matt 28:18-20

6 Ascension.
Livy 1.16.6; Ovid, Metam. 14.820-24;
Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Ant. rom.
2.56.2-6;Plutarch, Rom. 27.7; Luke 24:51;
Acts 1:9

7 Son of god.
Livy 1.16.3 Matt 27:54; Dionysius of
Halicarnas- sus, Ant. rom. 2.56.2; Mark
15:39; John 20:31

8 Meeting on the road.
Ovid, Fasti 2.475-511; Dionysius of
Halicarnassus, Ant. rom. 2.63.3-4;
Luke 24:13-35; Acts 9:3-19

9 Eyewitness testimony .
Cicero, Resp. 2.10; Livy 1.16.1-8; Ovid,
Fasti 2.475-511; Dionysius of Halicarnassus,
Ant. rom. 2.63.3-4; Plutarch, Rom. 27-28;
Luke 24:35; 1 Cor 15:3-11

10 Taken away in a cloud.
Livy 1.16.1; Dionysius of Halicarnassus,
Ant. rom. 2.56.2-6; Acts 1:9

11 Dubious alternative accounts.
Livy 1.16.4-5; Plutarch, Rom. 27.5-6, 8;
Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Ant. rom.
2.56.2-6; 2.63.3; Matt 28:11-14

12 Immortal/heavenly body.
Livy 1.16.8; Ovid, Metam. 14.818-28;
Plutarch, Rom. 28.6-8; 1 Cor 15:35-50;
1 Pet 3:18

13 Outside of the city.
Livy 1.16.1; Plutarch, Rom. 27.6; John 19:17

14 The people flee (populifugia).
Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Ant. rom.
2.56.5;Plutarch, Rom. 27.7; Matt (26:56);
28:8; Mark (14:50); 16:8

15 Deification.
Livy 1.16.3; Cicero, Resp. 2.10.20b; Ovid,
Fasti 2.475-511; Dionysius of Halicarnassus,
Ant. rom. 2.56.5-6; Plutarch, Rom. 27.7;
28.3; Matt 27:54; Rom 1:4

16 Belief, homage, and rejoicing.
Ovid, Fasti 2.475-511; Dionysius of
Halicarnassus, Ant. rom. 2.63.3-4; Plutarch,
Rom. 27.8; Matt 28:9, 17; Luke 24:41, 52; John 20:27

17 Bright and shining appearance.
Plutarch, Rom. 28.1-2; Ovid, Fasti 2.475-511;
Matt 17:2; Mark 9:3; Luke 9:29; Acts 9:3; Rev 1:16

18 Frightened subjects.
Ovid, Fasti 2.475-511; Livy 1.16.2;
Plutarch,Rom. 28.2; Matt 28:5, 10; Mark
16:8; Luke 24:37-38

19 All in sorrow over loss.
Livy 1.16.2; Ovid, Fasti 2.475-511;
Plutarch, Rom. 28.2; Luke 24:18-24

20 Inspired message of translation
Plutarch, Rom. 28.3; Acts 1:4-8; 2:1-4"
 

Sam Slagg

Member
Messages
273

It's so over your head, you think I'm the dumb one.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Be careful when you start posting what you think I think. I will post my thoughts and opinions. Don't presume you are so much smarter than everyone else. I don't think you are dumb but certainly misguided. Not interested in religious rhetoric so please don't bother. Thank you.
 

Top