Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Spirituality & Mysticism
1500 Year Old Bible Claims Jesus Christ Was Not Crucified – Vatican In Awe
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trevelyan" data-source="post: 85720" data-attributes="member: 5753"><p>"In February 2012, it was confirmed by the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_Ministry_of_Culture_and_Tourism" target="_blank">Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism</a> that a 52-page biblical manuscript in Syriac had been deposited in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnography_Museum_of_Ankara" target="_blank">Ethnography Museum of Ankara</a>.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Barnabus#cite_note-Xinhuanet-63" target="_blank">[63]</a> Newspaper reports in Turkey claimed that the manuscript had been found in Cyprus in 2000, in an operation conducted by police against smugglers, and had been kept in a police repository since then;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Barnabus#cite_note-64" target="_blank">[64]</a> and further speculated that the text of the manuscript could be that of the Gospel of Barnabas. No subsequent confirmation has been made, either as to the contents of the Ankara manuscript, or as to any findings of scientific tests for its age and authenticity.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Barnabus#cite_note-Xinhuanet-63" target="_blank">[63]</a> In March 2012 Dr Assad Sauma, an expert in medieval Syriac texts, reported that the manuscript deposited in the Ethonography Museum could be identified with one for which he had formerly undertaken a partial analysis. He stated that the portions of text that he had examined had consisted of random gospel verses and quotations; and also that he had been unable to find any correspondence between them and the text of the Gospel of Barnabas." </p><p></p><p>'The earliest document mentioning a Barnabas gospel which is generally agreed to correspond with the one found in the two known manuscripts is reported to be contained in Morisco manuscript BNM MS 9653 in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madrid" target="_blank">Madrid</a>, written about 1634 by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ibrahim_al-Taybili&action=edit&redlink=1" target="_blank">Ibrahim al-Taybili</a> in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunisia" target="_blank">Tunisia</a>.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Barnabus#cite_note-5" target="_blank">[5]</a> While describing how the Bible predicts Muhammad, he speaks of the "Gospel of Saint Barnabas where one can find the light" ("y así mismo en Evangelio de San Bernabé, donde se hallará la luz"). The first published account of the Gospel was in 1717, when a brief reference to the Spanish text is found in <em>De religione Mohamedica</em> by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adriaan_Reland" target="_blank">Adriaan Reland</a>;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Barnabus#cite_note-Fremaux_1999_14_Iisbn.3D9782701013893-6" target="_blank">[6]</a> and then in 1718, a much more detailed description of the Italian text by the Irish <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deism" target="_blank">deist</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Toland" target="_blank">John Toland</a>." </p><p></p><p>"In 1985, it was briefly claimed that an early <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syriac_language" target="_blank">Syriac</a> copy of this gospel had been found near <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hakk%C3%A2ri" target="_blank">Hakkâri</a> in eastern <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkey" target="_blank">Turkey</a>.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Barnabus#cite_note-61" target="_blank">[61]</a> However, it has since been demonstrated that this manuscript actually contains the canonical Bible.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Barnabus#cite_note-62" target="_blank">[62]</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think it is far fetched to say the Vatican is in awe.</p><p></p><p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>Cosmo, redacted by protestants, but not Catholics or the Orthodox who affirmed those books at the Council of Trent in response to Luther's claim that the books were edifying but not canon. Since then, protestant groups have gone so far as trying to prevent the reprinting of those books. It might be noted that most hardcore creationist are protestants and both the Catholics and the Orthodox.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trevelyan, post: 85720, member: 5753"] "In February 2012, it was confirmed by the [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_Ministry_of_Culture_and_Tourism']Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism[/URL] that a 52-page biblical manuscript in Syriac had been deposited in the [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnography_Museum_of_Ankara']Ethnography Museum of Ankara[/URL].[URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Barnabus#cite_note-Xinhuanet-63'][63][/URL] Newspaper reports in Turkey claimed that the manuscript had been found in Cyprus in 2000, in an operation conducted by police against smugglers, and had been kept in a police repository since then;[URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Barnabus#cite_note-64'][64][/URL] and further speculated that the text of the manuscript could be that of the Gospel of Barnabas. No subsequent confirmation has been made, either as to the contents of the Ankara manuscript, or as to any findings of scientific tests for its age and authenticity.[URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Barnabus#cite_note-Xinhuanet-63'][63][/URL] In March 2012 Dr Assad Sauma, an expert in medieval Syriac texts, reported that the manuscript deposited in the Ethonography Museum could be identified with one for which he had formerly undertaken a partial analysis. He stated that the portions of text that he had examined had consisted of random gospel verses and quotations; and also that he had been unable to find any correspondence between them and the text of the Gospel of Barnabas." 'The earliest document mentioning a Barnabas gospel which is generally agreed to correspond with the one found in the two known manuscripts is reported to be contained in Morisco manuscript BNM MS 9653 in [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madrid']Madrid[/URL], written about 1634 by [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ibrahim_al-Taybili&action=edit&redlink=1']Ibrahim al-Taybili[/URL] in [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunisia']Tunisia[/URL].[URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Barnabus#cite_note-5'][5][/URL] While describing how the Bible predicts Muhammad, he speaks of the "Gospel of Saint Barnabas where one can find the light" ("y así mismo en Evangelio de San Bernabé, donde se hallará la luz"). The first published account of the Gospel was in 1717, when a brief reference to the Spanish text is found in [I]De religione Mohamedica[/I] by [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adriaan_Reland']Adriaan Reland[/URL];[URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Barnabus#cite_note-Fremaux_1999_14_Iisbn.3D9782701013893-6'][6][/URL] and then in 1718, a much more detailed description of the Italian text by the Irish [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deism']deist[/URL] [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Toland']John Toland[/URL]." "In 1985, it was briefly claimed that an early [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syriac_language']Syriac[/URL] copy of this gospel had been found near [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hakk%C3%A2ri']Hakkâri[/URL] in eastern [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkey']Turkey[/URL].[URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Barnabus#cite_note-61'][61][/URL] However, it has since been demonstrated that this manuscript actually contains the canonical Bible.[URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Barnabus#cite_note-62'][62][/URL] I think it is far fetched to say the Vatican is in awe. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cosmo, redacted by protestants, but not Catholics or the Orthodox who affirmed those books at the Council of Trent in response to Luther's claim that the books were edifying but not canon. Since then, protestant groups have gone so far as trying to prevent the reprinting of those books. It might be noted that most hardcore creationist are protestants and both the Catholics and the Orthodox. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Spirituality & Mysticism
1500 Year Old Bible Claims Jesus Christ Was Not Crucified – Vatican In Awe
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top