Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
911 Attacks: 13 years later
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wyldberi" data-source="post: 93076" data-attributes="member: 6095"><p>Today I came across an interview conducted by Whitley Streiber last year. It's an audio recording posted on YouTube of his conversation with Jim Marrs, the well-known investigative reporter who has published a number of books that cover the range of subjects that range from secret government to UFO's to the assassination of President Kennedy.</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]flYR1KgwMwE[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>It seems the topic of the discussion was supposed to have been the Secret Government. From the outset, Marrs took control of the interview and directed it back to the events of September 11, 2001, as he views that to be a handy date from which to examine the changes that have occurred in the United States of America, as well as where we stand today. Streiber seems to have been pleased with impromptu change to his agenda, and eventually they did get into the Secret Government, the inception of the National Security State, the National Security Council, on up to manner in which FEMA prevented any investigation of the destruction of the World Trade Center in New York City in 2001.</p><p></p><p>What caught my ear early into interview was he comment Marrs made about the terrorist hijackers of the planes used to carry out the attacks ... if you buy into the distorted version of history invented by the cheney/bush administration at the time. Like many of you, I am supposing, I heard the report about the alleged hijacker who had come forward and repudiated the story that he was one of the hijackers. In this interview Marrs makes the comment that six or eight of these alleged hijackers have been located, alive and well, apparently living non-terrorist lives in different countries around the world (I forget the exact number he mentions; you'll have to check that out for yourself if you're interested).</p><p></p><p>The discussion ends with the state of the current U.S. economy, in which all the cash is flowing into the hands of the banks and the corporations. This is described as corporate socialism backed up by the appeal to pseudo patriotism that is nothing more than an attempt to create a fervent sense of nationalism.</p><p></p><p>The old adage applies, if you want to know what happened, follow the money. Who gained the most from the "terrorist" attacks? IMO, it was the terrorists who hold the reins of power in this country. When I stopped in at my bank a couple of days ago, there was a sign on the manager's desk:</p><p></p><p>THE PATRIOT ACT REQUIRES IDENTIFICATION WHEN ESTABLISHING A NEW ACCOUNT.</p><p></p><p>Talk about following the money. Yes, there were requirements before 2001, but now, it's all being placed under the guise of The Patriot Act.</p><p></p><p>This act of Congress has no foundation in Constitutional law; it is an unconstitutional act of Congress that curtails the Rights of Citizens guaranteed by the protections of the U.S. Constitution. The correct term to apply to this act is usurpation.</p><p></p><p>The Constitution limits the authority of Congress by specifying what it can and cannot do. Chief amongst these limitations is the prohibition against making changes to the Constitution; this authority is reserved to a referendum by the People acting apart from Congress.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wyldberi, post: 93076, member: 6095"] Today I came across an interview conducted by Whitley Streiber last year. It's an audio recording posted on YouTube of his conversation with Jim Marrs, the well-known investigative reporter who has published a number of books that cover the range of subjects that range from secret government to UFO's to the assassination of President Kennedy. [MEDIA=youtube]flYR1KgwMwE[/MEDIA] It seems the topic of the discussion was supposed to have been the Secret Government. From the outset, Marrs took control of the interview and directed it back to the events of September 11, 2001, as he views that to be a handy date from which to examine the changes that have occurred in the United States of America, as well as where we stand today. Streiber seems to have been pleased with impromptu change to his agenda, and eventually they did get into the Secret Government, the inception of the National Security State, the National Security Council, on up to manner in which FEMA prevented any investigation of the destruction of the World Trade Center in New York City in 2001. What caught my ear early into interview was he comment Marrs made about the terrorist hijackers of the planes used to carry out the attacks ... if you buy into the distorted version of history invented by the cheney/bush administration at the time. Like many of you, I am supposing, I heard the report about the alleged hijacker who had come forward and repudiated the story that he was one of the hijackers. In this interview Marrs makes the comment that six or eight of these alleged hijackers have been located, alive and well, apparently living non-terrorist lives in different countries around the world (I forget the exact number he mentions; you'll have to check that out for yourself if you're interested). The discussion ends with the state of the current U.S. economy, in which all the cash is flowing into the hands of the banks and the corporations. This is described as corporate socialism backed up by the appeal to pseudo patriotism that is nothing more than an attempt to create a fervent sense of nationalism. The old adage applies, if you want to know what happened, follow the money. Who gained the most from the "terrorist" attacks? IMO, it was the terrorists who hold the reins of power in this country. When I stopped in at my bank a couple of days ago, there was a sign on the manager's desk: THE PATRIOT ACT REQUIRES IDENTIFICATION WHEN ESTABLISHING A NEW ACCOUNT. Talk about following the money. Yes, there were requirements before 2001, but now, it's all being placed under the guise of The Patriot Act. This act of Congress has no foundation in Constitutional law; it is an unconstitutional act of Congress that curtails the Rights of Citizens guaranteed by the protections of the U.S. Constitution. The correct term to apply to this act is usurpation. The Constitution limits the authority of Congress by specifying what it can and cannot do. Chief amongst these limitations is the prohibition against making changes to the Constitution; this authority is reserved to a referendum by the People acting apart from Congress. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
911 Attacks: 13 years later
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top