Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
A Time Travel-Related Blueprint For My Career
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Einstein" data-source="post: 102071" data-attributes="member: 288"><p>Just my own delving into how they work. I do tend to favor the Bob Lazar story. If the ET's developed this technology, then it had to start with some basic understanding that we don't have. So far I have discovered our science has made a very strong attempt to eliminate all the different types of weight. Making them equivalent. Then using the theoretical concept of mass to understand our reality. It's my firm conviction that you will never be able to build anything using this theoretical fiction we are taught in school. </p><p></p><p>All the different types of weight exist apparently independent of each other. What makes then independent is that they all point in different directions. There is no school to educate you in understanding how all the different types of weight work to create our reality. But each type of weight has its own set of facts that you can learn about on your own. I've discovered you can't use fiction to invent anything. You have to use real facts. So if you do make up some theory, that theory better be comprised of facts. Or it wont work. If a theory is not testable, throw it out. </p><p></p><p>I call this approach, Mother Natures classroom. She has much more fun stuff to learn about than you learned in school. </p><p></p><p>Here is a little teaser that I came across. Nuclear force doesn't extend beyond the boundaries of the nucleus. Did you ever notice that mechanical force seems to have an identical similarity? Mechanical force never extends beyond the physical boundaries of the object it originates within. Both mechanical force and nuclear force do not have force fields associated with them.</p><p></p><p>Another clue to this similarity is gravitational weight. If we oscillate gravitational weight, there doesn't appear to be any transmission of this oscillation to other objects that are not physically connected. So by this analogy, it tends to suggest that gravitational acceleration may be something else. Or we aren't really making gravitational weight oscillate. </p><p></p><p>So you can see that working with facts gives much more meaning to the learning experience, than working with fiction. I think in order to understand how UFO propulsion works, you have to rigidly adhere to Mother Natures facts. And don't throw any of them out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Einstein, post: 102071, member: 288"] Just my own delving into how they work. I do tend to favor the Bob Lazar story. If the ET's developed this technology, then it had to start with some basic understanding that we don't have. So far I have discovered our science has made a very strong attempt to eliminate all the different types of weight. Making them equivalent. Then using the theoretical concept of mass to understand our reality. It's my firm conviction that you will never be able to build anything using this theoretical fiction we are taught in school. All the different types of weight exist apparently independent of each other. What makes then independent is that they all point in different directions. There is no school to educate you in understanding how all the different types of weight work to create our reality. But each type of weight has its own set of facts that you can learn about on your own. I've discovered you can't use fiction to invent anything. You have to use real facts. So if you do make up some theory, that theory better be comprised of facts. Or it wont work. If a theory is not testable, throw it out. I call this approach, Mother Natures classroom. She has much more fun stuff to learn about than you learned in school. Here is a little teaser that I came across. Nuclear force doesn't extend beyond the boundaries of the nucleus. Did you ever notice that mechanical force seems to have an identical similarity? Mechanical force never extends beyond the physical boundaries of the object it originates within. Both mechanical force and nuclear force do not have force fields associated with them. Another clue to this similarity is gravitational weight. If we oscillate gravitational weight, there doesn't appear to be any transmission of this oscillation to other objects that are not physically connected. So by this analogy, it tends to suggest that gravitational acceleration may be something else. Or we aren't really making gravitational weight oscillate. So you can see that working with facts gives much more meaning to the learning experience, than working with fiction. I think in order to understand how UFO propulsion works, you have to rigidly adhere to Mother Natures facts. And don't throw any of them out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
A Time Travel-Related Blueprint For My Career
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top