Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Philosophy, Metaphysics & the Afterlife
Biblical Creation Or Scientific? Maybe Both.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Peregrini" data-source="post: 44597" data-attributes="member: 2670"><p>Greetings all;</p><p>I found this forum quite by accident and having read some of the posts I find that fortunate.(For me anyway. It remains to be seen how the posters here feel) Many of the topics and subjects are interesting and I hope if and when I comment it adds to, not detracts from, the overall quality.</p><p>I chose here to be my first post and introduction to this forum because this topic has been a favorite of mine for many years. If I may offer an opinion.</p><p>If one reads Genesis 1 and 2 with this thought in mind my view might make sense.</p><p>How would a man, some 2600 years ago with very limited scientific understanding, try to explain the Big Bang to others of his time after having it reveled to him by someone from this time? It might sound exactly like Genesis 1 does. Also it appears that Genesis 1 is the "plan" and Genesis 2 is the "act".</p><p>Genesis follows the Big Bang Theory quite well as well as earths evolutionary theory. Forming, land mass formation, water accumulating into seas and oceans, life beginning in the sea, then land, lower forms and then ultimately man. </p><p>Just a view for you to consider if you wish. And perhaps if anyone is interested we can discuss a solution to the conflicts of evolution vs. creation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Peregrini, post: 44597, member: 2670"] Greetings all; I found this forum quite by accident and having read some of the posts I find that fortunate.(For me anyway. It remains to be seen how the posters here feel) Many of the topics and subjects are interesting and I hope if and when I comment it adds to, not detracts from, the overall quality. I chose here to be my first post and introduction to this forum because this topic has been a favorite of mine for many years. If I may offer an opinion. If one reads Genesis 1 and 2 with this thought in mind my view might make sense. How would a man, some 2600 years ago with very limited scientific understanding, try to explain the Big Bang to others of his time after having it reveled to him by someone from this time? It might sound exactly like Genesis 1 does. Also it appears that Genesis 1 is the "plan" and Genesis 2 is the "act". Genesis follows the Big Bang Theory quite well as well as earths evolutionary theory. Forming, land mass formation, water accumulating into seas and oceans, life beginning in the sea, then land, lower forms and then ultimately man. Just a view for you to consider if you wish. And perhaps if anyone is interested we can discuss a solution to the conflicts of evolution vs. creation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Philosophy, Metaphysics & the Afterlife
Biblical Creation Or Scientific? Maybe Both.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top