Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Spirituality & Mysticism
Historian says piece of papyrus refers to Jesus' wife
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justinian" data-source="post: 58723" data-attributes="member: 923"><p>You are right on the money BT with saying it will never be exposed. And in saying about people needing something to believe in. I mean it's cool if you just want to say HEY.. I'm a sheep, I followed the herd, and when you die if there's nothing there you can at least say you tried. I think though that the two of us think along the same lines as far as inception of faiths. If you really really dig back into HISTORICAL findings on religions. Not what's wrote in any religious book. You will find just that people did need something to believe in, and some smart guy gave it to them. Regardless of real or not, that's how it went down. But with this article specifically.. I'm failing to find the reasoning behind whether or not Jesus having a wife is such a bad thing. I mean.. did anyone ever look at the fact that most of the angels are men? Or at least appear as manly characters. And that jesus' disciples were men? I mean.. maybe God and Jesus are gay.. I say that jokingly, but only to prove my point.. does it really matter? If God only liked men, but knew that it took a woman to procreate.. would that really change your religion? If it does, then obviously your faith wasn't as good as what you originally planned.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justinian, post: 58723, member: 923"] You are right on the money BT with saying it will never be exposed. And in saying about people needing something to believe in. I mean it's cool if you just want to say HEY.. I'm a sheep, I followed the herd, and when you die if there's nothing there you can at least say you tried. I think though that the two of us think along the same lines as far as inception of faiths. If you really really dig back into HISTORICAL findings on religions. Not what's wrote in any religious book. You will find just that people did need something to believe in, and some smart guy gave it to them. Regardless of real or not, that's how it went down. But with this article specifically.. I'm failing to find the reasoning behind whether or not Jesus having a wife is such a bad thing. I mean.. did anyone ever look at the fact that most of the angels are men? Or at least appear as manly characters. And that jesus' disciples were men? I mean.. maybe God and Jesus are gay.. I say that jokingly, but only to prove my point.. does it really matter? If God only liked men, but knew that it took a woman to procreate.. would that really change your religion? If it does, then obviously your faith wasn't as good as what you originally planned. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Spirituality & Mysticism
Historian says piece of papyrus refers to Jesus' wife
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top