Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
In Time
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AAA" data-source="post: 107849" data-attributes="member: 5790"><p>There are several people on this planet who've discovered solid and compelling evidence of time travel to the past, which is in direct conflict with your hypothesis. You're hypothesizing in terms of IF/CAN/CANNOT while others hypothesize HOW.</p><p></p><p>We don't know how it works yet. What we do know is indicative of it being entirely possible, as per evidence discovered as well as breakthroughs being made in theoretical physics. Thus any position in the matter is somewhat premature. It can only go so far. At this point in time, it is similar to the abstract and obscure nature of a religious debate. ("Substance of things hoped for, evidence of things unseen")</p><p></p><p>But let's indulge anyway, just for fun.</p><p></p><p>One can argue that not going back when/how you are 'supposed' to is an equivalent example of deviation. In other words; going back to alter things is equal to not going back if you are destined to do so. Perhaps each time it is done, it sets/resets the form of the time line, and any action not exact to the set form can/will result in turbulence. Maybe that's just part of how it works. ...like an expected effect thereof.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AAA, post: 107849, member: 5790"] There are several people on this planet who've discovered solid and compelling evidence of time travel to the past, which is in direct conflict with your hypothesis. You're hypothesizing in terms of IF/CAN/CANNOT while others hypothesize HOW. We don't know how it works yet. What we do know is indicative of it being entirely possible, as per evidence discovered as well as breakthroughs being made in theoretical physics. Thus any position in the matter is somewhat premature. It can only go so far. At this point in time, it is similar to the abstract and obscure nature of a religious debate. ("Substance of things hoped for, evidence of things unseen") But let's indulge anyway, just for fun. One can argue that not going back when/how you are 'supposed' to is an equivalent example of deviation. In other words; going back to alter things is equal to not going back if you are destined to do so. Perhaps each time it is done, it sets/resets the form of the time line, and any action not exact to the set form can/will result in turbulence. Maybe that's just part of how it works. ...like an expected effect thereof. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
In Time
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top