Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor and the Ebola Outbreak
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ayasano" data-source="post: 92100" data-attributes="member: 4804"><p>The nurses handled fluid samples that were used to test for ebola, and they actually did it <strong><em>without</em></strong> as much protective gear as they should have had.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/15/dallas-ebola-patient-nurses_n_5991814.html" target="_blank">Nurses Treated Ebola Patient Thomas Eric Duncan Without Proper Protective Gear, Group Says</a></p><p></p><p>I should clarify, by the way, that if you run into someone showing Ebola symptoms, I'm not saying you should wash your hands and forget about it. Obviously take them to a hospital and avoid contact with people where possible. The virus can survive for hours or days on surfaces, for one thing, and most people have a habit of touching their face pretty regularly. </p><p></p><p>I'm just saying Ebola really isn't as contagious and out of control as people think. (At least not in countries with decent medical care, anyway) The fact that it's not contagious until symptoms occur means it's a vastly different scenario to, say, Flu, where you're contagious for weeks before symptoms show up. That, and the lack of airborne or water transmission in Ebola.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ayasano, post: 92100, member: 4804"] The nurses handled fluid samples that were used to test for ebola, and they actually did it [B][I]without[/I][/B] as much protective gear as they should have had. [url="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/15/dallas-ebola-patient-nurses_n_5991814.html"]Nurses Treated Ebola Patient Thomas Eric Duncan Without Proper Protective Gear, Group Says[/url] I should clarify, by the way, that if you run into someone showing Ebola symptoms, I'm not saying you should wash your hands and forget about it. Obviously take them to a hospital and avoid contact with people where possible. The virus can survive for hours or days on surfaces, for one thing, and most people have a habit of touching their face pretty regularly. I'm just saying Ebola really isn't as contagious and out of control as people think. (At least not in countries with decent medical care, anyway) The fact that it's not contagious until symptoms occur means it's a vastly different scenario to, say, Flu, where you're contagious for weeks before symptoms show up. That, and the lack of airborne or water transmission in Ebola. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor and the Ebola Outbreak
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top