Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor: N-Day March 12, 2015?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tomrat" data-source="post: 72727" data-attributes="member: 4042"><p>there would be almost no ground contamination and the fallout (also : no dust no fallout) would be spread out more</p><p> you can take a look at this <a href="http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Nwfaq/Nfaq5.html" target="_blank">Effects of Nuclear Explosions</a> if you are interested in that.</p><p>additionally i should mention that most of the time they talk about airburst below the lower atmosphere (thats about 20 miles) and those are way more devastating than a ground hit...but what i tried to mention here are high altitude a-bomb explosions (above 20 miles) where the radiation and fallout is a whole different story and the goal would be more destroying electronics (i let you think about the consequences), satelites ,long range misiles and so on....</p><p>well i should apologize for writing "current a-bomb tactic" because the other tactics have not dissapeared.</p><p>i should have written "most likely a-bomb tactic" and also that it depends highly on the targets. be sure IF they use a-bombs and target the military they WILL use whatever makes the worst damage without caring about the radiation and long term problems (that would be a below 20 mile strike in a overlapping three or seven pattern)</p><p>as far as i know wars are still fought between combatants and not civilians (and the flag on a uniform is exactly what turns you into a combatant!)....as long as this counts a high altitude a-bomb strike is more likely than any other.</p><p>of course we will never know how maniac they will turn on civilians until it happens.</p><p> </p><p>how can i assume all of this? well lets just say back then some of the classes in the military scared the shit out of me+reading+personal opinion</p><p>greets tomrat</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tomrat, post: 72727, member: 4042"] there would be almost no ground contamination and the fallout (also : no dust no fallout) would be spread out more you can take a look at this [url="http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Nwfaq/Nfaq5.html"]Effects of Nuclear Explosions[/url] if you are interested in that. additionally i should mention that most of the time they talk about airburst below the lower atmosphere (thats about 20 miles) and those are way more devastating than a ground hit...but what i tried to mention here are high altitude a-bomb explosions (above 20 miles) where the radiation and fallout is a whole different story and the goal would be more destroying electronics (i let you think about the consequences), satelites ,long range misiles and so on.... well i should apologize for writing "current a-bomb tactic" because the other tactics have not dissapeared. i should have written "most likely a-bomb tactic" and also that it depends highly on the targets. be sure IF they use a-bombs and target the military they WILL use whatever makes the worst damage without caring about the radiation and long term problems (that would be a below 20 mile strike in a overlapping three or seven pattern) as far as i know wars are still fought between combatants and not civilians (and the flag on a uniform is exactly what turns you into a combatant!)....as long as this counts a high altitude a-bomb strike is more likely than any other. of course we will never know how maniac they will turn on civilians until it happens. how can i assume all of this? well lets just say back then some of the classes in the military scared the shit out of me+reading+personal opinion greets tomrat [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor: N-Day March 12, 2015?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top