Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Kerr black holes( Roy Kerr
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Einstein" data-source="post: 163633" data-attributes="member: 288"><p>The only problem with Black Holes is that they are just a theoretical mathematical construct. No definitive proof that they exist in our universe has been found. It does seem to me that the original inventor of the concept is not being given the credit he deserves either. </p><p></p><p>Of course no one has come forth with an explanation for the jet phenomena that we observe. Those rapidly rotating neutron stars spewing out jets of matter at their poles. It does seem that this could be the proof we need to show why we haven't found one credible candidate for a Black Hole. Mother nature doesn't allow matter to coalesce into a Black Hole.</p><p></p><p>Then the fact that matter is rapidly exiting at the poles doesn't seem to be following normal rules either. Since it would be more normal to see matter exiting at the rapidly rotating circumference of the neutron star due to centrifugal forces. It's almost like time was reversed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Einstein, post: 163633, member: 288"] The only problem with Black Holes is that they are just a theoretical mathematical construct. No definitive proof that they exist in our universe has been found. It does seem to me that the original inventor of the concept is not being given the credit he deserves either. Of course no one has come forth with an explanation for the jet phenomena that we observe. Those rapidly rotating neutron stars spewing out jets of matter at their poles. It does seem that this could be the proof we need to show why we haven't found one credible candidate for a Black Hole. Mother nature doesn't allow matter to coalesce into a Black Hole. Then the fact that matter is rapidly exiting at the poles doesn't seem to be following normal rules either. Since it would be more normal to see matter exiting at the rapidly rotating circumference of the neutron star due to centrifugal forces. It's almost like time was reversed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Kerr black holes( Roy Kerr
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top