Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Community Meta
Forum Feedback & Support
Moderating Is Jesus Azizus Monobaz?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harte" data-source="post: 96017" data-attributes="member: 443"><p>I think it is FAR from it.</p><p> </p><p>People come on here making claims, like any message board. What I see is Deshi pointing out the rudeness of Ren, and not showing any rudeness himself (unless one thinks that pointing out rudeness is itself too rude to be acceptable.)</p><p> </p><p>This thread doesn't contain all the rude comments I refer to, admittedly. But Deshi has a very valid point. It is utterly unacceptable to state some belief as factual and then ridicule people that ask why you believe this for "not studying" the ridiculous claim themselves.</p><p> </p><p>What is the point of posting the claim in the first place, if that is to be the response?</p><p> </p><p>I asked about the claim and got no answer. I note that Ren has posted in this thread a line of hooey about the etymology of the word Christ, a false etymology that I was able to debunk in approximately 5 seconds online at multiple etymology sites.</p><p> </p><p>If it is acceptable for a poster to pretend to know it all, then post total crap disinformation in a feeble attempt to justify his empty claims while ridiculiing others for not already knowing about it, then, to my mind, it is certainly acceptable for another poster to call him on it.</p><p> </p><p>Harte</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harte, post: 96017, member: 443"] I think it is FAR from it. People come on here making claims, like any message board. What I see is Deshi pointing out the rudeness of Ren, and not showing any rudeness himself (unless one thinks that pointing out rudeness is itself too rude to be acceptable.) This thread doesn't contain all the rude comments I refer to, admittedly. But Deshi has a very valid point. It is utterly unacceptable to state some belief as factual and then ridicule people that ask why you believe this for "not studying" the ridiculous claim themselves. What is the point of posting the claim in the first place, if that is to be the response? I asked about the claim and got no answer. I note that Ren has posted in this thread a line of hooey about the etymology of the word Christ, a false etymology that I was able to debunk in approximately 5 seconds online at multiple etymology sites. If it is acceptable for a poster to pretend to know it all, then post total crap disinformation in a feeble attempt to justify his empty claims while ridiculiing others for not already knowing about it, then, to my mind, it is certainly acceptable for another poster to call him on it. Harte [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Community Meta
Forum Feedback & Support
Moderating Is Jesus Azizus Monobaz?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top