Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Community Meta
Forum Feedback & Support
Moderating Is Jesus Azizus Monobaz?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sanyam Deshi" data-source="post: 96241" data-attributes="member: 5926"><p>[USER=4272]@PaulaJedi[/USER]</p><p></p><p>I understand you are close friends with Ren, but please at least try to distinguish the differences between an argument against him and a personal attack against him. All of my messages directed him have been relevant and targeted at this claim:</p><p></p><p>This, logically given by the wording, shows his own lack of acknowledgement toward any sort of opposition. I messaged you this a few days ago, but all I have ever been attempting to do is show that his belief is indeed an opinion.</p><p></p><p>In response to post #10, I am not bullying him because I have never had the intention of hurting anyone and I have not had the tone to back up such claim. In my opinion, if we are going to consider anyone as a bully, it is the one who constantly belittle's the other person, and I have greatly restrained myself from doing so, as I am aware that no good comes from doing so. You're failure to see who the one person who can potentially be classified as a bully is a result of (what I believe to be) blind friendship. I sincerely apologize if reading this claim makes you angry.</p><p></p><p>In response to post #12, the one person hating in the thread is the person who is persecuting an entire group of people for their beliefs. I don't hate Ren. I simply wish he would see things straight and allow people to have their own beliefs. As I said in one of my last posts, Ren is generalizing an entire group of people based on their worst members, and it would be great if he would stop doing that. I have nothing against Ren, and I believe that i have kept conversations on-topic for the most part. I don't believe my words have shown any predisposed biases against him.</p><p></p><p>Also, you are going to compare arguments against Ren to potential causes of suicide? As far as I have seen, nobody has said anything remotely out-of-line. If you're going to compare opposing debaters to possible reasons for someone to kill themselves, I'm just going to view it as your lack of willingness to hear those with disagreements. Your creation of this comparison is sickening in itself.</p><p></p><p>In response to post #15, I found this post quite amusing. If you have been following the conversations at all in the other thread, it becomes strikingly apparent who is throwing around the word ignorant most of the time, as well as who is implying mental illness most of the time.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In summary, I, too, was hoping to have an unbiased conversation with Ren in his group, despite his tendencies to include pieces of his arguments that are direct attacks against the people who create the opposition and not the argument itself. My initial post was in the hopes to continue the conversation we had in the other thread. When I first made the post that you see at the beginning of this thread, you had responded with a highly heated message comparable to someone shouting "bomb" on an airplane. I had responded to this, hoping to justify my inclusion of the message on the topic. Num7 deleted the post before you were able to read it. In summary, I said that I wished to continue our discussion from before, but I didn't want to use the old topic because I knew that I'd be accused of continuing to drag that thread off-topic. I can only hope that you realize the negative impact it has when Ren says that his opinions are facts, and I can only hope that Ren will improve for the future. I may have said it awhile ago in a totally different conversation, but when I have a debate or an argument, it's for the sake for everyone to be better than they were before they entered it. The point isn't to bring the opposition down.</p><p></p><p>One last thing: I keep getting accused of having moderation-worthy material, but nobody has been able to pin what exactly that I am saying that is breaking rules. I think that I have been keeping my side of the argument pretty tame, so I'm hoping that the choices to moderate my posts haven't just been a bias against me due to the fact that I'm arguing against two of this forum's most loyal members. I will gladly take any constructive criticism to use in the ways that I argue in the future.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sanyam Deshi, post: 96241, member: 5926"] [USER=4272]@PaulaJedi[/USER] I understand you are close friends with Ren, but please at least try to distinguish the differences between an argument against him and a personal attack against him. All of my messages directed him have been relevant and targeted at this claim: This, logically given by the wording, shows his own lack of acknowledgement toward any sort of opposition. I messaged you this a few days ago, but all I have ever been attempting to do is show that his belief is indeed an opinion. In response to post #10, I am not bullying him because I have never had the intention of hurting anyone and I have not had the tone to back up such claim. In my opinion, if we are going to consider anyone as a bully, it is the one who constantly belittle's the other person, and I have greatly restrained myself from doing so, as I am aware that no good comes from doing so. You're failure to see who the one person who can potentially be classified as a bully is a result of (what I believe to be) blind friendship. I sincerely apologize if reading this claim makes you angry. In response to post #12, the one person hating in the thread is the person who is persecuting an entire group of people for their beliefs. I don't hate Ren. I simply wish he would see things straight and allow people to have their own beliefs. As I said in one of my last posts, Ren is generalizing an entire group of people based on their worst members, and it would be great if he would stop doing that. I have nothing against Ren, and I believe that i have kept conversations on-topic for the most part. I don't believe my words have shown any predisposed biases against him. Also, you are going to compare arguments against Ren to potential causes of suicide? As far as I have seen, nobody has said anything remotely out-of-line. If you're going to compare opposing debaters to possible reasons for someone to kill themselves, I'm just going to view it as your lack of willingness to hear those with disagreements. Your creation of this comparison is sickening in itself. In response to post #15, I found this post quite amusing. If you have been following the conversations at all in the other thread, it becomes strikingly apparent who is throwing around the word ignorant most of the time, as well as who is implying mental illness most of the time. In summary, I, too, was hoping to have an unbiased conversation with Ren in his group, despite his tendencies to include pieces of his arguments that are direct attacks against the people who create the opposition and not the argument itself. My initial post was in the hopes to continue the conversation we had in the other thread. When I first made the post that you see at the beginning of this thread, you had responded with a highly heated message comparable to someone shouting "bomb" on an airplane. I had responded to this, hoping to justify my inclusion of the message on the topic. Num7 deleted the post before you were able to read it. In summary, I said that I wished to continue our discussion from before, but I didn't want to use the old topic because I knew that I'd be accused of continuing to drag that thread off-topic. I can only hope that you realize the negative impact it has when Ren says that his opinions are facts, and I can only hope that Ren will improve for the future. I may have said it awhile ago in a totally different conversation, but when I have a debate or an argument, it's for the sake for everyone to be better than they were before they entered it. The point isn't to bring the opposition down. One last thing: I keep getting accused of having moderation-worthy material, but nobody has been able to pin what exactly that I am saying that is breaking rules. I think that I have been keeping my side of the argument pretty tame, so I'm hoping that the choices to moderate my posts haven't just been a bias against me due to the fact that I'm arguing against two of this forum's most loyal members. I will gladly take any constructive criticism to use in the ways that I argue in the future. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Community Meta
Forum Feedback & Support
Moderating Is Jesus Azizus Monobaz?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top