Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Monarch Project
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OakFieldAlienz444" data-source="post: 252081" data-attributes="member: 12609"><p>This is what I've always thought of Monarch too. I think it's a red herring.</p><p>I think there is indeed some kind of a program like this but it's put out</p><p>there with either zero proof or the proof being very hard to find.</p><p>MKULTRA is a documented fact, Monarch is debatable.</p><p>I have noticed that almost all female celebrities are obsessed with </p><p>the monarch butterfly but this alone isn't proof and it's used</p><p>as proof by proponents of the theory. The theory is basically</p><p>that Monarch is different from MKULTRA in that Monarch</p><p>is almost exclusively sexual mind control designed to create</p><p>beautiful sexy women who will do whatever you want.</p><p>Marilyn Monroe was supposedly the first victim, then Britney Spears, Katy Perry</p><p>and all the rest. Interestingly Marilyn had a nightmare about her head being cut open,</p><p>but this again proves nothing. We need actual documentation as in papers</p><p>from the CIA or whoever's doing this and so far none has come forward.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OakFieldAlienz444, post: 252081, member: 12609"] This is what I've always thought of Monarch too. I think it's a red herring. I think there is indeed some kind of a program like this but it's put out there with either zero proof or the proof being very hard to find. MKULTRA is a documented fact, Monarch is debatable. I have noticed that almost all female celebrities are obsessed with the monarch butterfly but this alone isn't proof and it's used as proof by proponents of the theory. The theory is basically that Monarch is different from MKULTRA in that Monarch is almost exclusively sexual mind control designed to create beautiful sexy women who will do whatever you want. Marilyn Monroe was supposedly the first victim, then Britney Spears, Katy Perry and all the rest. Interestingly Marilyn had a nightmare about her head being cut open, but this again proves nothing. We need actual documentation as in papers from the CIA or whoever's doing this and so far none has come forward. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Monarch Project
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top