Re: NASA Moon Landing hoax
You're right, I didn't read that far LOL....Anyway, if you've ever listened to "communications" transmissions (which I'm assuming they're talking about), a uni-directional proximity microphone sits almost directly in front of the astronaut's mouth and voice activated. Not likely to hear much besides the astronaut's voice, which we didn't. Otherwise, there would be most likely be silence. I'm sure the astronauts did hear the thrusters. Had there been "cabin" microphones, we probably would have too.
Z-
DB, I believe you, but do you have any references on that? Maybe they didn't use artifical light, it just looks that way on the pics....But either way, the cameras wouldn't focus on distant light, and would show as "blackness" in the background.How can that be? They didnt bring any artificial light sources, according to NASA. All they had was the natural light, that being the sun light.
heh, that's on you to prove, not me to disprove.Unlesss you are refering to the studio on Earth where they did the shots?
\"After all, the astronauts are sitting on an engine that can produce 10.000 lb. of thrust and burning at 5000 degrees Fahrenheit of heat. Air inside the module was pressurized to 1/3 sea level atmosphere, so why no sound and vibration? According to some sources the astronauts could hear the thrusters charging, yet we cannot hear the immense engine in the background of any transmissions?\"
You're right, I didn't read that far LOL....Anyway, if you've ever listened to "communications" transmissions (which I'm assuming they're talking about), a uni-directional proximity microphone sits almost directly in front of the astronaut's mouth and voice activated. Not likely to hear much besides the astronaut's voice, which we didn't. Otherwise, there would be most likely be silence. I'm sure the astronauts did hear the thrusters. Had there been "cabin" microphones, we probably would have too.
Z-