Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Parallel past?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Japrim" data-source="post: 137964" data-attributes="member: 7558"><p>Excellent point.</p><p></p><p>Cause/effect would originate from your decisions, thus it stands to reason that your decision making process function properly and you have an understanding of time travel before you start tweaking things across time.</p><p></p><p>I think mechanical aptitude and intellect are almost a requirement if you expect to not wreck something/everything.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, excellent point.</p><p></p><p>When I am contemplating hypothetical missions, pondering all the what who when where hows and whys, I find myself trying to do so with the parameters of having the least amount of influence as possible, to do what is intended, but nothing else. ...just for that reason. I consider the exponentials of the butterfly effect.</p><p></p><p>Your presence alone can potentially have disastrous effects. You catch a nasty flu-type sickness that knocks you out for a week. It spreads to others who would otherwise not get the flu. One of them happens to be a retired 80 something year old, who is particularly vulnerable to disease, who is also a chemist and about to invent a new highly efficient readily available fuel, thus stopping wars and famine, death, heath issues, economic effects, etc., etc., ..because you were simply there to cough in an elevator or something, you got them sick, they die, and thus the world endures/suffers for another 50 years before someone else invents it.</p><p></p><p>You would have to stay relatively isolated as to avoid a potential disaster.</p><p></p><p>Visa versa; If you were an integral part of a time line, and you didn't go back to make it so, it could have the same disastrous effects, only from an inverse mechanical application (if you will).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Japrim, post: 137964, member: 7558"] Excellent point. Cause/effect would originate from your decisions, thus it stands to reason that your decision making process function properly and you have an understanding of time travel before you start tweaking things across time. I think mechanical aptitude and intellect are almost a requirement if you expect to not wreck something/everything. Again, excellent point. When I am contemplating hypothetical missions, pondering all the what who when where hows and whys, I find myself trying to do so with the parameters of having the least amount of influence as possible, to do what is intended, but nothing else. ...just for that reason. I consider the exponentials of the butterfly effect. Your presence alone can potentially have disastrous effects. You catch a nasty flu-type sickness that knocks you out for a week. It spreads to others who would otherwise not get the flu. One of them happens to be a retired 80 something year old, who is particularly vulnerable to disease, who is also a chemist and about to invent a new highly efficient readily available fuel, thus stopping wars and famine, death, heath issues, economic effects, etc., etc., ..because you were simply there to cough in an elevator or something, you got them sick, they die, and thus the world endures/suffers for another 50 years before someone else invents it. You would have to stay relatively isolated as to avoid a potential disaster. Visa versa; If you were an integral part of a time line, and you didn't go back to make it so, it could have the same disastrous effects, only from an inverse mechanical application (if you will). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Parallel past?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top