Pattern? maybe civil unrest, proof?
I am from the uk and have been looking closely at the us government progress, climaxing to the elections. I am not calling anyone in particular states dumb so please don't be offended, just a strong opinion.
Point:
The states that kerry won in the elections were the more *advanced* and *influential* states, a contrast to the more *hillbilly* states that bush won.
My sources to back this claim:
The whole of the westboard of america and the north-east more influential states voted for kerry, rather like a pattern. What do I mean by influential, educated and e-commerce states? New york, california, ect ..
The states that voted for bush on the other hand tended to be the less educated, states in central america which could easier be *brainwashed* with the media.
Could this be a basis of a split? or perhaps coincidence, and if so a split, when will it climax?
Just an idea
I am from the uk and have been looking closely at the us government progress, climaxing to the elections. I am not calling anyone in particular states dumb so please don't be offended, just a strong opinion.
Point:
The states that kerry won in the elections were the more *advanced* and *influential* states, a contrast to the more *hillbilly* states that bush won.
My sources to back this claim:
The whole of the westboard of america and the north-east more influential states voted for kerry, rather like a pattern. What do I mean by influential, educated and e-commerce states? New york, california, ect ..
The states that voted for bush on the other hand tended to be the less educated, states in central america which could easier be *brainwashed* with the media.
Could this be a basis of a split? or perhaps coincidence, and if so a split, when will it climax?
Just an idea