Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Quantum Gravity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sevensixtwo" data-source="post: 134870" data-attributes="member: 3162"><p>You can see here I clearly state an idea on page two of the Dark Energy paper (that arXiv rejected) actually turned out to be Einstein's equation and k={-1,0-1} is the {א,H,Ω} on which I defined a novel connection between geometric manifolds and algebraic vector spaces in the second paper. The paper arXiv rejected is so clean. It is better than 99.99% of other papers in my opinion. In the third paper, I derived a unique experimental predication for all the particles of the standard model plus two new spin-1 particles called G and <strong>ζ. </strong>It may be that these are the Higgslike particle found in 2012 and also <a href="http://www.science20.com/a_quantum_diaries_survivor/the_750_gev_diphoton_bump_what_it_cannot_be-162715" target="_blank">the other particle they are suspecting at 750 GeV</a>. Recall Higgs predicted a scalar particle (spin-0) but I am predicting two (spin-1) particles and the final source of known data in particle physics, the <a href="http://pdg.lbl.gov/" target="_blank">Particle Data Group</a> (bottom), have still not made any declarations about the identity of the culprit in the data that was so graciously celebrated on July 4, 2012. <a href="http://resonaances.blogspot.com/2015/12/a-new-boson-at-750-gev.html" target="_blank">They will have an answer about the existence of the other particle in August 2015</a>.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://vixra.org/abs/1208.0077" target="_blank">Dark Energy in M-Theory, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:1208.0077</a></p><p></p><p><a href="http://vixra.org/abs/1301.0032" target="_blank">Geometric Cosmology, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:1301.0032</a></p><p></p><p><a href="http://vixra.org/abs/1302.0037" target="_blank">Quantum Structure, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:1302.0037</a></p><p></p><p></p><p><img src="http://i.imgur.com/9jqf2Re.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p><img src="http://i.imgur.com/ZvZMe6l.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sevensixtwo, post: 134870, member: 3162"] You can see here I clearly state an idea on page two of the Dark Energy paper (that arXiv rejected) actually turned out to be Einstein's equation and k={-1,0-1} is the {א,H,Ω} on which I defined a novel connection between geometric manifolds and algebraic vector spaces in the second paper. The paper arXiv rejected is so clean. It is better than 99.99% of other papers in my opinion. In the third paper, I derived a unique experimental predication for all the particles of the standard model plus two new spin-1 particles called G and [B]ζ. [/B]It may be that these are the Higgslike particle found in 2012 and also [URL='http://www.science20.com/a_quantum_diaries_survivor/the_750_gev_diphoton_bump_what_it_cannot_be-162715']the other particle they are suspecting at 750 GeV[/URL]. Recall Higgs predicted a scalar particle (spin-0) but I am predicting two (spin-1) particles and the final source of known data in particle physics, the [URL='http://pdg.lbl.gov/']Particle Data Group[/URL] (bottom), have still not made any declarations about the identity of the culprit in the data that was so graciously celebrated on July 4, 2012. [URL='http://resonaances.blogspot.com/2015/12/a-new-boson-at-750-gev.html']They will have an answer about the existence of the other particle in August 2015[/URL]. [URL='http://vixra.org/abs/1208.0077']Dark Energy in M-Theory, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:1208.0077[/URL] [URL='http://vixra.org/abs/1301.0032']Geometric Cosmology, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:1301.0032[/URL] [URL='http://vixra.org/abs/1302.0037']Quantum Structure, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:1302.0037[/URL] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/9jqf2Re.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/ZvZMe6l.jpg[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Quantum Gravity
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top