Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Real Photos of Black Holes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ayasano" data-source="post: 88038" data-attributes="member: 4804"><p>Ah, so you don't dispute the presence of a supermassive object, just the nature of the object?</p><p></p><p>The problem with your theory of an empty centre is that it doesn't match up with the observations. For example, what about the gravitational lensing observed when a free-moving black hole moves across the sky? There's no apparent matter rotating around that object, just the black hole itself occupying a very small volume, invisible but for the effect it has on the stars around it. If the mass were more spread out, the lensing effect would be different.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/opo0003b/" target="_blank">Lone Black Hole Passes in Front of Star (Hubble View) | ESA/Hubble</a></p><p></p><p><img src="http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/600000/images/_603423_hubb300.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> </p><p></p><p>Note the same star appearing twice due to the lensing effect from the black hole.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ayasano, post: 88038, member: 4804"] Ah, so you don't dispute the presence of a supermassive object, just the nature of the object? The problem with your theory of an empty centre is that it doesn't match up with the observations. For example, what about the gravitational lensing observed when a free-moving black hole moves across the sky? There's no apparent matter rotating around that object, just the black hole itself occupying a very small volume, invisible but for the effect it has on the stars around it. If the mass were more spread out, the lensing effect would be different. [url="http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/opo0003b/"]Lone Black Hole Passes in Front of Star (Hubble View) | ESA/Hubble[/url] [IMG]http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/600000/images/_603423_hubb300.jpg[/IMG] Note the same star appearing twice due to the lensing effect from the black hole. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Real Photos of Black Holes
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top