Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Real Photos of Black Holes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Einstein" data-source="post: 88061" data-attributes="member: 288"><p>I would agree that all the astronomical observations are debatable. Because we can't prove any interpretation is correct. But we could construct those interpretations out of FACTS instead of the ASSUMPTIONS that are prevalent and dominant in our science. So it's merely a matter of preference. Do you want to believe in FACTS? Or ASSUMPTIONS?</p><p></p><p>All the info that we know about mass and gravity is conveniently described away with assumptions. We can't produce gravity in a laboratory setting, because of those assumptions about gravity and mass that we are taught.</p><p></p><p>I'm not a subscriber to General Relativity. That theory appears to me to be completely comprised of disinformation. </p><p></p><p>What about GPS? The engineers that designed GPS say they didn't use General Relativity to design the system. The clocks on the GPS satellites are continuously updated to overcome the positioning errors that develop over time. The accuracy for military positioning is at 2mm. The update frequency is classified. But you could calculate that update frequency using the 2mm error limit as the permissible error allowed. These are the real facts about GPS. </p><p></p><p>What about micro lensing? Well if gravity doesn't bend light, then we are left with using some other mechanism to describe the observation. The presence of gas and plasma could easily replace an assumption based theory. So we are merely just looking at the presence of gas and/or plasma causing the lensing phenomena. The greater the distance, the higher the lensing. Could be a way to gauge different gas densities at different locations throughout the galaxy.</p><p></p><p>We daily see this phenomena on the horizon with either the sun or the moon. The thing that surprised me was that the sun or the moon could actually be beyond the horizon when close to the horizon because of this lensing effect. Just like the sun does to stars behind it. </p><p></p><p>Now lets take a look at the galactic center. Remember I previously stated that there may be nothing at the center. But the direction of gravity is backwards due to the weight of the galaxy being outside the center. So the center would technically be a region of space that behaves like anti-gravity. Time would flow faster there. And those x-ray objects moving toward the center may actually be bouncing off.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Einstein, post: 88061, member: 288"] I would agree that all the astronomical observations are debatable. Because we can't prove any interpretation is correct. But we could construct those interpretations out of FACTS instead of the ASSUMPTIONS that are prevalent and dominant in our science. So it's merely a matter of preference. Do you want to believe in FACTS? Or ASSUMPTIONS? All the info that we know about mass and gravity is conveniently described away with assumptions. We can't produce gravity in a laboratory setting, because of those assumptions about gravity and mass that we are taught. I'm not a subscriber to General Relativity. That theory appears to me to be completely comprised of disinformation. What about GPS? The engineers that designed GPS say they didn't use General Relativity to design the system. The clocks on the GPS satellites are continuously updated to overcome the positioning errors that develop over time. The accuracy for military positioning is at 2mm. The update frequency is classified. But you could calculate that update frequency using the 2mm error limit as the permissible error allowed. These are the real facts about GPS. What about micro lensing? Well if gravity doesn't bend light, then we are left with using some other mechanism to describe the observation. The presence of gas and plasma could easily replace an assumption based theory. So we are merely just looking at the presence of gas and/or plasma causing the lensing phenomena. The greater the distance, the higher the lensing. Could be a way to gauge different gas densities at different locations throughout the galaxy. We daily see this phenomena on the horizon with either the sun or the moon. The thing that surprised me was that the sun or the moon could actually be beyond the horizon when close to the horizon because of this lensing effect. Just like the sun does to stars behind it. Now lets take a look at the galactic center. Remember I previously stated that there may be nothing at the center. But the direction of gravity is backwards due to the weight of the galaxy being outside the center. So the center would technically be a region of space that behaves like anti-gravity. Time would flow faster there. And those x-ray objects moving toward the center may actually be bouncing off. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Real Photos of Black Holes
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top