Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Rotating Gravity Field
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Einstein" data-source="post: 139923" data-attributes="member: 288"><p>The experiment involves using the concept of weight instead of mass. In physics there is very little reference to weight. In fact there is a belief that gravitational weight and inertial weight is the same thing. Einstein incorporates that belief into his Principal of Equivalence. But in physics the concept of mass is used exclusively with no regard to what kind of weight the mass originates from. It's like we are being led to believe that there is only one type of force. </p><p></p><p>So my idea was to take an electric car to the moon and see if it would accelerate faster on a road built for its use on the moon. Since the mass would be the same. Using physics that we are taught in school, the car should accelerate just the same. But on the moon the weight of the car is 1/6 what it is here on earth. And we can prove experimentally here on earth that if we cut the weight of the car down to 1/6 of what it is, the car will indeed accelerate faster. So my prediction would be that the car on the moon would accelerate faster because it weighs less. But that would screw up the concept of mass that we are taught in school. Totally invalidating its use. </p><p></p><p>Now if the car does accelerate just the same on the moon as it does here on earth, then this experiment would show that gravitational weight and inertial weight are completely independant of one another. Totally invalidating Einstein's Principal of Equivalence. That would suggest that mass would also be different for each type of basic force as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Einstein, post: 139923, member: 288"] The experiment involves using the concept of weight instead of mass. In physics there is very little reference to weight. In fact there is a belief that gravitational weight and inertial weight is the same thing. Einstein incorporates that belief into his Principal of Equivalence. But in physics the concept of mass is used exclusively with no regard to what kind of weight the mass originates from. It's like we are being led to believe that there is only one type of force. So my idea was to take an electric car to the moon and see if it would accelerate faster on a road built for its use on the moon. Since the mass would be the same. Using physics that we are taught in school, the car should accelerate just the same. But on the moon the weight of the car is 1/6 what it is here on earth. And we can prove experimentally here on earth that if we cut the weight of the car down to 1/6 of what it is, the car will indeed accelerate faster. So my prediction would be that the car on the moon would accelerate faster because it weighs less. But that would screw up the concept of mass that we are taught in school. Totally invalidating its use. Now if the car does accelerate just the same on the moon as it does here on earth, then this experiment would show that gravitational weight and inertial weight are completely independant of one another. Totally invalidating Einstein's Principal of Equivalence. That would suggest that mass would also be different for each type of basic force as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Rotating Gravity Field
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top