Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Supply checklist
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheOrangeMan" data-source="post: 7298" data-attributes="member: 120"><p><strong>Supply checklist</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I do not agree it is the end of humanity. Yes, society as we know it would be destroyed. Yes, millions which did survive would be destroyed from starvation, radiation, disease, etc.</p><p></p><p>However there are people that <strong>would survive</strong> and would carve out a niche. During WW2 and the Cold War nukes were much different then the ones we have now... the new tactical nuclear weapons sported by the US and Russia are designed for minimum damage on the landscape, and maximum causality rate. It allows a force to destroy the enemy but leave enough useable land for control by the victor military.</p><p></p><p>The down side is when two countries take out each others government and infrastructure, there is no assault by ground based forces. Everything falls apart, and then you pick up the pieces and rebuild. The MAD plans of the Cold war are much different then what we see today. It's as John says... cities (infrastructure) are the targets. You destroy the infrastructure and country on it?s knees for 10-30 years as they pick up the pieces.</p><p></p><p>(I love this discussion.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheOrangeMan, post: 7298, member: 120"] [b]Supply checklist[/b] I do not agree it is the end of humanity. Yes, society as we know it would be destroyed. Yes, millions which did survive would be destroyed from starvation, radiation, disease, etc. However there are people that [b]would survive[/b] and would carve out a niche. During WW2 and the Cold War nukes were much different then the ones we have now... the new tactical nuclear weapons sported by the US and Russia are designed for minimum damage on the landscape, and maximum causality rate. It allows a force to destroy the enemy but leave enough useable land for control by the victor military. The down side is when two countries take out each others government and infrastructure, there is no assault by ground based forces. Everything falls apart, and then you pick up the pieces and rebuild. The MAD plans of the Cold war are much different then what we see today. It's as John says... cities (infrastructure) are the targets. You destroy the infrastructure and country on it?s knees for 10-30 years as they pick up the pieces. (I love this discussion.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Supply checklist
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top