Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
The Fantastic Galactic Source of Planet Warming
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Octavusprime" data-source="post: 63790" data-attributes="member: 3091"><p>We must belong to different scientific communities. How about a few sources:</p><p></p><p>National Geographic: <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/12/1206_041206_global_warming.html" target="_blank">Global Warming Fast Facts</a></p><p></p><p>EPA: <a href="http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/causes.html" target="_blank">Causes of Climate Change | Climate Change | US EPA</a></p><p></p><p>NY times 1/8/12</p><p><a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/globalwarming/index.html" target="_blank">http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/globalwarming/index.html</a></p><p></p><p>Cutting down the rainforest does not cool the planet in the long run. It's like cutting off your finger because you broke a bone. Sure you can get back into the game faster but you'll never get back the finger which may effect your long term game performance.</p><p></p><p>Deforestation only allows radiant heat to bounce back into space. Sure it has a net cooling effect. Now you have a useless desert, altered rainfall patterns and thousands of extinct species. </p><p></p><p>Let's use another analogy to tackle the "world adapts" stance. Let's say I have a drum of nuclear waste. I decide the easy way of disposing of it is to dump it into the ocean. Is this moral? Sure the vast ocean will dilute it and it will settle under sand. But shouldn't we have the moral obligation to limit our impact on the ecology and protect the only home we have for future generations?</p><p></p><p>This cop out that the world adapts, pisses me off. No one wants to change their ways and invest in best practices and sustainable living. It's ignorance and laziness that fuel this thinking. IMO.</p><p></p><p>Not everything is a conspiracy. Some dangers are very real. Unfortunately with this real and present danger it will probably be too little too late. And regardless of political views, we all lose.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Octavusprime, post: 63790, member: 3091"] We must belong to different scientific communities. How about a few sources: National Geographic: [url="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/12/1206_041206_global_warming.html"]Global Warming Fast Facts[/url] EPA: [url="http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/causes.html"]Causes of Climate Change | Climate Change | US EPA[/url] NY times 1/8/12 [url="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/globalwarming/index.html"]http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/globalwarming/index.html[/url] Cutting down the rainforest does not cool the planet in the long run. It's like cutting off your finger because you broke a bone. Sure you can get back into the game faster but you'll never get back the finger which may effect your long term game performance. Deforestation only allows radiant heat to bounce back into space. Sure it has a net cooling effect. Now you have a useless desert, altered rainfall patterns and thousands of extinct species. Let's use another analogy to tackle the "world adapts" stance. Let's say I have a drum of nuclear waste. I decide the easy way of disposing of it is to dump it into the ocean. Is this moral? Sure the vast ocean will dilute it and it will settle under sand. But shouldn't we have the moral obligation to limit our impact on the ecology and protect the only home we have for future generations? This cop out that the world adapts, pisses me off. No one wants to change their ways and invest in best practices and sustainable living. It's ignorance and laziness that fuel this thinking. IMO. Not everything is a conspiracy. Some dangers are very real. Unfortunately with this real and present danger it will probably be too little too late. And regardless of political views, we all lose. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
The Fantastic Galactic Source of Planet Warming
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top