Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Time Travel Investigators
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eddy_P" data-source="post: 90988" data-attributes="member: 581"><p>Yep. I have read all of Pegg's work and still have about a third to present. Having in my possession actual evidence that can be physically held and examined - with the results able to be reproduced by anyone - holds against opinions that say "no" even though the people making those uninformed statements have not personally viewed it for themselves.</p><p>Those who shout and personally put me down prove by their own actions that they have not bothered to check it for themselves.</p><p>So yes, uninformed opinions (and rude people) do not phase me.</p><p></p><p>(If I had not obtained (ie. gone out and purchased them) the resources cited by Pegg myself and independently reproduced his results using his methods, I would still be a skeptic too.)</p><p>I am waiting for people to review Pegg's work (and my follow up research) and then tell me exactly where it is incorrect - not in "their opinion or based on traditional concepts" - but where Pegg's actual citations, methods, and references are incorrect thus producing incorrect conclusions.</p><p></p><p>My first Paper is an answer to all those who for years have been calling for a "Paper" - but you can lead a horse to water...</p><p></p><p>Here and on other forums people have viewed me "coming and going" every few months or years as a negative thing. People, this is brand new research, it takes time. My initial attempts at presenting Pegg's work could have (should have) been done better. I took the view of letting eveyone have the opportunity to view and examine Pegg's findings as I confirmed them, instead of sitting on the results.</p><p>I started my own research on this in 2002, and by the way, I do have a private life beyond 'time travel'. The information has been hidden in ancient texts and stories, in plain sight for over 3,000 years - so another decade is neither here nor there.</p><p></p><p>Currently only the Australia Time Travel Study Group presents workshops where anyone can sit and examine Pegg's claims.</p><p>If you are in Australia, come and hold the evidence, compare it with your ancient text, come to your own conclusions.</p><p>Sometimes I am available to be a guest at their workshop.</p><p>Details: <a href="http://www.tt2012.com.au/index.html" target="_blank">First Definitive Proof of TIME TRAVEL. Australian TIME TRAVEL Study Group. Adelaide Workshop Shows the Proof | The Pegg Project&reg;</a></p><p>Cheers,</p><p>Eddy</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eddy_P, post: 90988, member: 581"] Yep. I have read all of Pegg's work and still have about a third to present. Having in my possession actual evidence that can be physically held and examined - with the results able to be reproduced by anyone - holds against opinions that say "no" even though the people making those uninformed statements have not personally viewed it for themselves. Those who shout and personally put me down prove by their own actions that they have not bothered to check it for themselves. So yes, uninformed opinions (and rude people) do not phase me. (If I had not obtained (ie. gone out and purchased them) the resources cited by Pegg myself and independently reproduced his results using his methods, I would still be a skeptic too.) I am waiting for people to review Pegg's work (and my follow up research) and then tell me exactly where it is incorrect - not in "their opinion or based on traditional concepts" - but where Pegg's actual citations, methods, and references are incorrect thus producing incorrect conclusions. My first Paper is an answer to all those who for years have been calling for a "Paper" - but you can lead a horse to water... Here and on other forums people have viewed me "coming and going" every few months or years as a negative thing. People, this is brand new research, it takes time. My initial attempts at presenting Pegg's work could have (should have) been done better. I took the view of letting eveyone have the opportunity to view and examine Pegg's findings as I confirmed them, instead of sitting on the results. I started my own research on this in 2002, and by the way, I do have a private life beyond 'time travel'. The information has been hidden in ancient texts and stories, in plain sight for over 3,000 years - so another decade is neither here nor there. Currently only the Australia Time Travel Study Group presents workshops where anyone can sit and examine Pegg's claims. If you are in Australia, come and hold the evidence, compare it with your ancient text, come to your own conclusions. Sometimes I am available to be a guest at their workshop. Details: [url="http://www.tt2012.com.au/index.html"]First Definitive Proof of TIME TRAVEL. Australian TIME TRAVEL Study Group. Adelaide Workshop Shows the Proof | The Pegg Project®[/url] Cheers, Eddy [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Time Travel Investigators
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top