Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
unanswered questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ayasano" data-source="post: 92193" data-attributes="member: 4804"><p>That right there makes his claim pretty shaky to be honest. If the machine doesn't move through space then when he landed in 2001 he'd be off in deep space somewhere. Time Travel hoaxes always seem to forget that the Earth is constantly moving. Firstly, its own rotation. Secondly, its orbit around the Sun, and thirdly the Sun's orbit around the Milky Way.</p><p></p><p>You could argue that he simply meant it takes the Earth's motion into account or something, but if it's accurate enough to land in <strong><em>exactly</em></strong> the same place on the surface of the Earth, why can't it land anywhere else? You have to move millions of kilometers regardless.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ayasano, post: 92193, member: 4804"] That right there makes his claim pretty shaky to be honest. If the machine doesn't move through space then when he landed in 2001 he'd be off in deep space somewhere. Time Travel hoaxes always seem to forget that the Earth is constantly moving. Firstly, its own rotation. Secondly, its orbit around the Sun, and thirdly the Sun's orbit around the Milky Way. You could argue that he simply meant it takes the Earth's motion into account or something, but if it's accurate enough to land in [B][I]exactly[/I][/B] the same place on the surface of the Earth, why can't it land anywhere else? You have to move millions of kilometers regardless. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
unanswered questions
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top