Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Waco Type Event - Bundy Ranch
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="madman17" data-source="post: 84245" data-attributes="member: 5518"><p>Do you know what a singularity is? This answer is, I know, you don't, so I will ELI5 why you are clueless.</p><p></p><p>A singularity has a theoretical infinite density, but no guaranteed mass. Density is how much stuff is in crammed into one place, basically (I'm ELI5'ing it here for you). An empty paper bag has less mass than full paper bag. A singularity (especially a time-space based naked singularity created in a gravitational field in a vacuum) would have (basically*) no mass. Mass describes the amount of matter in an object. Without mass, you have no weight. You could, theoretically keep filling up a singularity with stuff** until it weighs billions of pounds, but, until you do, it's basically weightless. ALSO, keep in mind, the more stuff you add to the singularity, the greater it's own gravitational pull would become. If you were to keep chucking in your garbage, yes, eventually it would gain a mind of it's own, so to speak, and start sucking in everything else with it.</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately for people like you there are still people that are able to read and understand advanced scientific stuff, like you know, theoretical physics.</p><p></p><p>*The minimum theoretical mass of a black hole (which is made from a singularity in it) is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_mass" target="_blank">"plank mass"</a> (about 22 micrograms, or 0.000000048502e lbs). So, yeah, your belief that a singularity has a mass, and would weigh a metric shit ton is false.</p><p></p><p>**Assuming of course it didn't get destroyed by hawking radiation first. </p><p></p><p>Edit: Lastly, JT described it "rotating two electric microsigularities at high speed, it is possible to create and modify a local gravity sinusoid that replicates the affects of a Kerr black hole." So, again, if you add 22 micrograms with 22 micrograms, you only get 44 micrograms.... still basically weightless. But, then again, I'm not in the 2036 working on a time machine right now, what do I know? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite39" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="madman17, post: 84245, member: 5518"] Do you know what a singularity is? This answer is, I know, you don't, so I will ELI5 why you are clueless. A singularity has a theoretical infinite density, but no guaranteed mass. Density is how much stuff is in crammed into one place, basically (I'm ELI5'ing it here for you). An empty paper bag has less mass than full paper bag. A singularity (especially a time-space based naked singularity created in a gravitational field in a vacuum) would have (basically*) no mass. Mass describes the amount of matter in an object. Without mass, you have no weight. You could, theoretically keep filling up a singularity with stuff** until it weighs billions of pounds, but, until you do, it's basically weightless. ALSO, keep in mind, the more stuff you add to the singularity, the greater it's own gravitational pull would become. If you were to keep chucking in your garbage, yes, eventually it would gain a mind of it's own, so to speak, and start sucking in everything else with it. Unfortunately for people like you there are still people that are able to read and understand advanced scientific stuff, like you know, theoretical physics. *The minimum theoretical mass of a black hole (which is made from a singularity in it) is [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_mass']"plank mass"[/URL] (about 22 micrograms, or 0.000000048502e lbs). So, yeah, your belief that a singularity has a mass, and would weigh a metric shit ton is false. **Assuming of course it didn't get destroyed by hawking radiation first. Edit: Lastly, JT described it "rotating two electric microsigularities at high speed, it is possible to create and modify a local gravity sinusoid that replicates the affects of a Kerr black hole." So, again, if you add 22 micrograms with 22 micrograms, you only get 44 micrograms.... still basically weightless. But, then again, I'm not in the 2036 working on a time machine right now, what do I know? ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Waco Type Event - Bundy Ranch
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top