Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Waco Type Event - Bundy Ranch
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Earthmasque" data-source="post: 84307" data-attributes="member: 4383"><p>No, it is VERY ignorant.</p><p> </p><p>The Schwarzchild radius is the radius of any singularity of a given mass. If you look at the formula, you'll see there are only two variables, the radius of the singularity (r) and the mass of the singularity (M).</p><p> </p><p>If you "love math," this should make it clear to you that there is a linear relatiionship between the mass of any singularity and the radius of that singularity.</p><p> </p><p>More mass, larger radius. Smaller mass, smaller radius.</p><p> </p><p>A singularity cannot be "empty." If you believe this is false, I suggest you plug in zero for the mass in the formula and see what radius you get.</p><p> </p><p>This is the ignorant part:</p><p> </p><p></p><p>I thought you said it was "weightless." You yourself, then, are claiming to "know" the starting mass.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>The problem is, he didn't say "about the mass of an electron," he said, "about the size of an electron."</p><p></p><p>But that can't be right, can it? After all, you stated that singuilarities are "weightless." An electron is not weightless.</p><p>I note that you didn't calculate the mass of an electron-sized singularity. Why not?</p><p> </p><p>Classical electron radius: 2.8179 x 10^-15 meters</p><p>Rs = (2Gm)/(c*c)</p><p>2.8179 x 10^-15 = (2*(6.67×10^-11))M/(9 x 10^16)</p><p>(2.8179 x 10^-15)(9 x 10^16)/(2*(6.67×10^−11)) = M</p><p>M=190106446776g kilograms, approximately 384,015,022,488,756 lbs, which comes to 192,007,511,244 tons.</p><p> </p><p>Hey, you're right!</p><p> </p><p>It's only 192 <strong>BILLION</strong> tons! Per singularity.</p><p> </p><p>Still, a bit much to be toting around, I'd say (though you may disagree.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Earthmasque, post: 84307, member: 4383"] No, it is VERY ignorant. The Schwarzchild radius is the radius of any singularity of a given mass. If you look at the formula, you'll see there are only two variables, the radius of the singularity (r) and the mass of the singularity (M). If you "love math," this should make it clear to you that there is a linear relatiionship between the mass of any singularity and the radius of that singularity. More mass, larger radius. Smaller mass, smaller radius. A singularity cannot be "empty." If you believe this is false, I suggest you plug in zero for the mass in the formula and see what radius you get. This is the ignorant part: I thought you said it was "weightless." You yourself, then, are claiming to "know" the starting mass. The problem is, he didn't say "about the mass of an electron," he said, "about the size of an electron." But that can't be right, can it? After all, you stated that singuilarities are "weightless." An electron is not weightless. I note that you didn't calculate the mass of an electron-sized singularity. Why not? Classical electron radius: 2.8179 x 10^-15 meters Rs = (2Gm)/(c*c) 2.8179 x 10^-15 = (2*(6.67×10^-11))M/(9 x 10^16) (2.8179 x 10^-15)(9 x 10^16)/(2*(6.67×10^−11)) = M M=190106446776g kilograms, approximately 384,015,022,488,756 lbs, which comes to 192,007,511,244 tons. Hey, you're right! It's only 192 [B]BILLION[/B] tons! Per singularity. Still, a bit much to be toting around, I'd say (though you may disagree.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Waco Type Event - Bundy Ranch
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top