Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
What Evidence Would You Need for a Time Travel Claim?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Einstein" data-source="post: 60988" data-attributes="member: 288"><p>I did spend some time looking through these articles and still don't see anyone actually claiming credit for discovering the FIRST black hole yet. But some of the articles seem to have ignored the confirmation requirement and gone ahead assuming they exist and claiming they cause huge bursts of energy. Kind of like assuming the world is flat and you will fall off the edge if you walk far enough. So I'm suspecting that you haven't as yet learned to pick out the facts is these kinds of articles.</p><p> </p><p>If an astronomer does actually confirm the existence of a black hole, he will become famous. His name will be spoken by all. You'll even know his name. So after reading all those articles you posted, what was his name?</p><p> </p><p>I did a search on that. Funny... no names.</p><p> </p><p>When I first came across them, they were not called black hole. They were called Schwarzschild discontinuities.</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu/212_fall2003.web.dir/daniel_barnes/page2.htm" target="_blank">Dan's Web Project: Who Discovered Black Holes?</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.space.com/15421-black-holes-facts-formation-discovery-sdcmp.html" target="_blank"> All About Black Holes: Formation &amp; Discovery| Black Hole Facts &amp; Information | Space.com </a></p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>The above quote is highly suspicious to me. What I do see is there seems to be energy producing phenomena that they are claiming is caused by a black hole.</p><p> </p><p>So now we are on the subject of making stuff up. Here's my theory: When a huge star reaches the end of its life, it goes supernova. Releasing more energy output than the entire universe of stars combined. During that brief instant the supernova exists a black hole is formed to counteract the white hole. The two events exist simultaneously in time and cancel each other out. And from that point in time forward, both the white hole and black hole no longer exist.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Einstein, post: 60988, member: 288"] I did spend some time looking through these articles and still don't see anyone actually claiming credit for discovering the FIRST black hole yet. But some of the articles seem to have ignored the confirmation requirement and gone ahead assuming they exist and claiming they cause huge bursts of energy. Kind of like assuming the world is flat and you will fall off the edge if you walk far enough. So I'm suspecting that you haven't as yet learned to pick out the facts is these kinds of articles. If an astronomer does actually confirm the existence of a black hole, he will become famous. His name will be spoken by all. You'll even know his name. So after reading all those articles you posted, what was his name? I did a search on that. Funny... no names. When I first came across them, they were not called black hole. They were called Schwarzschild discontinuities. [url="http://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu/212_fall2003.web.dir/daniel_barnes/page2.htm"]Dan's Web Project: Who Discovered Black Holes?[/url] [url="http://www.space.com/15421-black-holes-facts-formation-discovery-sdcmp.html"] All About Black Holes: Formation & Discovery| Black Hole Facts & Information | Space.com [/url] The above quote is highly suspicious to me. What I do see is there seems to be energy producing phenomena that they are claiming is caused by a black hole. So now we are on the subject of making stuff up. Here's my theory: When a huge star reaches the end of its life, it goes supernova. Releasing more energy output than the entire universe of stars combined. During that brief instant the supernova exists a black hole is formed to counteract the white hole. The two events exist simultaneously in time and cancel each other out. And from that point in time forward, both the white hole and black hole no longer exist. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
What Evidence Would You Need for a Time Travel Claim?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top