Wireless data behavior.

[Harte]

All the data you have mentioned is transferred via electromagnetic waves, which travel at the speed of light.
Of course, that would be the wireless data. In a wire, the data would travel somewhat slower.
And yes, energy is bound by spacetime. Possibly potential energy may not be, if it's gravitational potential.
There is a theory that gravity "leaks" out of the space-time continuum, which would explain (among other things) why it's so weak in comparison to other forces.

Harte

 

[SergiusPaulus]

How long does wireless information exist in wireless form? Indefinitely or a few seconds or varies? What determines the duration of the wireless state of information?

 

[Beholder]

How long does wireless information exist in wireless form? Indefinitely or a few seconds or varies? What determines the duration of the wireless state of information?

If you send out a laser pulse into space, probably forever. For wifi, it will be diffused after around 20 meters at the speed of radio waves, so almost instantly vanishing, unless you can reverse the chaos using quantum hairs or something.

 

[lamdo263]

Hello SergiusPaulus, Interesting question. This would be subject to where the observer is. Wifi signals would be distorted/mutated by the timefields that they would be traveling through because a signal's carrier frequency is cycles per second and so if the seconds time rate changes, so does its frequency. If its frequency changes the transmission/receive will not be able to keep the communication in sync. This can be corrected depending on the application though. Do you have a specific application in mind?

If it's a pure data stream sent from one exact destination to another, then that data stream packet's taken up right away.

In order for that data stream to be able to do something, it would have to in some way be joined with artificial intelligence. AI is a kind of etheric lifeform that is semi-electronic in nature and is able to make a home in a computer. The two are sperate in how they handle along with reference to their environment.

 

[james]

Data on a computer is 0s and 1s, bits. When it’s transmitted via WIFI those bits are converted to energy. Then when received it is converted back to bits. That is my assumption. In its Wireless form can the data be manipulated in any way? I’m not experienced with WiFi so I’m shooting blind. When a device transmits via WiFi is that data in wireless form indefinitely or only a brief moment?

The data is already in energy form. Think of 0 and 1 as organized energy. This is not the problem in communication between timefields. Once the timing is skewed it becomes impossible to decode the packets properly. Its like trying to receive data at 14400 baud rate when data is transmitted at 115200 baud rate. These communication speeds have to match in order to have complete packets (where the data is encoded bits into bytes) to decode properly. If you are sending into the past you would slow down your baud rate and speed up the baud rate for transmitting into the future. But these rates would have to be targeted to match the time destination precisely. Tricky to do. A better method would be to send a very small computer (pre-programmed to deploy the package (send the message) when at the right time) to the right time by way of a time displacement field created by a torsion field. This is what I am currently working on now.

 

[SergiusPaulus]

James, Have you looked up Zeshua user on here? She was proven to be a fake I believe. But she claimed to be from the future able to communicate with the past. In 2020 she supposedly emailed me from 2027. At the same moments she started posting on here. I think her posts discuss some of the technology she was using.

 

[BlastTyrant]

How long does wireless information exist in wireless form? Indefinitely or a few seconds or varies? What determines the duration of the wireless state of information?

in a IT standpoint here Wireless Info only excists so long as it is being sent, after being sent or recieve it stops or as soon as the source stops it stops.

Example, if you're streaming a movie via bluetooth to your phone and your PC buffers then your phone will buffer, it is all subject to the source. Or even better, if you're doing a video call on your phone, someone hits a dead spot you lose connection, the connection and info is immediatly lost until a reconnection can occur.

So it is not like it can just linger in the air and someone can pick it up, once the source is cut it is done instantly.

Now you can tap into the source easily, that is why you can video call multiple people or stream the same movie or song to multiple devices, even if one device dies or cuts off the others are still present because the source is still going.

Long story short Wireless info cannot exist without something creating it and maintaining it.

 

[Beholder]

in a IT standpoint here Wireless Info only excists so long as it is being sent, after being sent or recieve it stops or as soon as the source stops it stops.

Example, if you're streaming a movie via bluetooth to your phone and your PC buffers then your phone will buffer, it is all subject to the source. Or even better, if you're doing a video call on your phone, someone hits a dead spot you lose connection, the connection and info is immediatly lost until a reconnection can occur.

So it is not like it can just linger in the air and someone can pick it up, once the source is cut it is done instantly.

Now you can tap into the source easily, that is why you can video call multiple people or stream the same movie or song to multiple devices, even if one device dies or cuts off the others are still present because the source is still going.

Long story short Wireless info cannot exist without something creating it and maintaining it.

A simple analogy for wifi is two drunk guys screaming at each other across a lake. Takes a while until the drunk slurring gets there, but you only get one chance to intercept the information if the reciever could hear the message and reply back acknowledging what was said, to avoid timeout and automatic resending. If one guy passes out, the other one will keep shouting the last message repeatedly, until giving up and going to bed.