50 years today, man set off to land on the Moon..Did it really happen?

[SensitiveAbility]

Well the only thing I am saying is nope never happened a hoax IMO.
They were on the "moon" yet you seen stars????

 

[titorite]

Well the only thing I am saying is nope never happened a hoax IMO.
They were on the "moon" yet you seen stars????

I know right. Them were some really super high res cameras that could pick up so much of the lunar landscape but not one star in lunar sky. And collins in the csm never took any pictures from the dark side.

It amazing how everything came up milhouse.

 

[Mooku]

Nope , if you watch the astronauts mannerisms when giving interviews it’s a clue how uncomfortable they look and just awkward . I think the space race was important for many politicians and governments and of course US had to be first and we didn’t have the technology then, why not just hire a good director?

 

[TimeFlipper]

Nope , if you watch the astronauts mannerisms when giving interviews it’s a clue how uncomfortable they look and just awkward . I think the space race was important for many politicians and governments and of course US had to be first and we didn’t have the technology then, why not just hire a good director?

Excellent posting cheers, and welcome to your new Paranormalis family ..

 

[TimeFlipper]

I know right. Them were some really super high res cameras that could pick up so much of the lunar landscape but not one star in lunar sky. And collins in the csm never took any pictures from the dark side.

It amazing how everything came up milhouse.

The main cameras were Hasselblad 500EL models, colour and B/W, and none of them fitted with a view finder...People have asked how could such perfectly aligned pictures, and perfect close up shots, possibly be taken?...Replies were the astronauts practised a lot using those cameras, or many pictures were taken, but only the best ones were displayed....Someone said, with reference to the close up shots, that a special wide angled lens was used...I didnt see or hear about them attempting to take off one lens, reach into a pocket, and fit another lens, did you? .

 

[Traveler7]

There is also a conspiracy in the moon about an alien girl who was found on a ship for the mission Appolo 20, it's surely an hoax but it's still interesting even if it's one.
Secret Apollo 20 Mission Found Alien Girl On The Moon In 1976

 

[TimeFlipper]

There is also a conspiracy in the moon about an alien girl who was found on a ship for the mission Appolo 20, it's surely an hoax but it's still interesting even if it's one.
Secret Apollo 20 Mission Found Alien Girl On The Moon In 1976

Damn it, so thats what my sister got up to, back in 1976!! ..

 

[SensitiveAbility]

Damn it, so thats what my sister got up to, back in 1976!! ..

 

[TimeFlipper]

Please move forward to 4 minutes on the video and listen very closely to what the guy says, until 4 minutes 50 seconds.....Has he unwittingly proved the Fake Moon Landings when he states, (No one has gone beyond Earths orbit yet)....If you cannot see the video in your own country, go onto You Tube and type in, "The final frontier: Astronauts on ISS tell EuroNews about humanities future in space" ..

 

[TimeFlipper]

Can NASA provide hard evidence of the Apollo Moon landings?, apparently they say that they can!!..

The "astronauts" brought back approximately 837 pounds (380kgs) of Moon rocks and soil samples, from the combined Apollo missions..
So, Moon rocks prove the landings dont they?, only if it can be established that they did not dig them out of the Earth firstly!..
Meteorites have been found in Antartica, which proved to have the same characteristics as the Moon rocks, Really??..

Back in 1967, two years before Apollo 11, NASA set up an expedition to Antarctica, joined by the German rocket engineer, Wernhner Von Braun, who was the leading propagandist for all the Lunar missions...Antarctica is the region of Earth with the largest concentration of Meteorites, but it is not known if that expedition included geologists, nor if any Meteorites were actually brought back!..

Infact, it was not until 1972 that Lunar Meteorites were "officially" discovered in Antarctica, their "Moon origin"was of course being determined by "comparison" with the Moon samples brought back by the Apollo crew members,....Therefore the Moon rocks are by no means a way of "proving" that they had been brought back from the Moon, or from Antarctica, or somewhere else on Earth for that matter!!..

But, things get worse for NASA..some of the so called Moon rocks have been proved to be fakes...In the 1990s a British astrobiologist Andrew Steele was granted special privilege to get close to some of the precious Moon rock samples, locked in a number of NASA safes...All that Steele discovered in those "safes" were a bristle, bits of plastic, nylon and teflon, and tiny Earth animals!! ..

Another Moon rock made the headlines.....forty years after, having being handed personally by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin to the Dutch Prime Minister, the rock was scrutinised and proven to be petrified wood!!....Ok, so a few fake Moon rocks does not necessarily prove beyond doubt, that all Moon rocks are fake...However, it should be reason enough for starting a systematic scientific examination of the dozens of other Moon rock samples, that the USA generously and ceremoniously gave away in 1970!!...But will that EVER happen??..

This is the photo of the "Moon Rock" that turned out to be petrified wood, which was valued at £308,000!!