My opinion: If aliens did not land at Roswell, THIS is actually the most likely explanation

OakFieldAlienz444

Senior Member
Messages
3,295
What if the “aliens” who crashed in Roswell were really Japanese?

Don't get the wrong idea. Read it. Nick Redfern, a well known UFO researcher believes this.
This makes far more sense than the wooden crash test dummies who were the size of giant humans when the aliens were described by military witnesses as being short with giant heads. It makes sense that in order to cover up a terrible thing like this you could just say "Oh, it was space aliens!" Chances are most people have never heard of any of these deformities that can happen to ordinary people etc

To be honest? This is the ONLY non space alien explanation of Roswell I've ever seen that makes a DAMN bit of sense.


Fact: Japan was working on balloon bombs known as Fugo Bombs. This would also explain why most accounts of the wreckage seem to match up perfectly with a balloon project. It also explains why there's a discrepancy and contradiction between normal wreckage and "weird" bodies.
Yeah, you couldn't bend it, couldn't burn it etc but skeptics don't go for that shit so we can toss it out, at least when it comes to this theory. Japanese companies often put pictures on their devices similar to the "heiroglyphics" seen on the I-beams.
Project Mogul's i-beam does not match up with the Roswell UFO, but the Japanese I-beams come slightly closer.

Another theory is that they were the creations of a team effort between Joseph Stalin and the Nazi guy Joseph Mengele but that doesn't make as much sense to me. Especially considering the animosity between the Russians and the Nazis. I think the most likely non-alien explanation is a secret Japanese project.
 
Last edited:

OakFieldAlienz444

Senior Member
Messages
3,295
Stanton Friedman and Nick Redfern had it out. In my honest opinion Nick Redfern came off as way more believable than Friedman's critique of him.

Friedman vs. Redfern - Round 1
https://redstarfilms.blogspot.com/2005/06/friedman-vs-redfern-round-2.html


You may be wondering why I would post this when I myself claim to be an alien abductee.
There may be ANOTHER otherworldy force at work involved with that---and secondly some of them may be government projects in guise of aliens. Anyone who hasn't read Nick Redfern's books I would encourage to take a loot at them. I'm the kind of person who is naturally a healthy skeptic, but when I see and experience things first hand (I have seen aliens AND ufos both) I try to look for OTHER rational explanations. Yeah, I dig harder than most skeptics. Sorry peeps. Most skeptics just want nothing to do with aliens or secret projects or anything that sounds so goofy and cartoony to them so they ignore it all and just say "CRASH DUMMIES, TEEHEE" yeah right.

Abductions might be carried out by government agents wearing Halloween costumes and using advanced drugs and high technology
 

Last edited:
Messages
297
The Fugo Bombs never got anywhere near New Mexico and none even landed there or at Roswell...Of course I know your going to deny that but oh well..
 

OakFieldAlienz444

Senior Member
Messages
3,295
IMPERIAL JAPANESE AIRCRAFT - THE TRUTH BEHIND ROSWELL AND BATTLE OF LA "UFO's"

Roswell Whistleblower: The Real Story, From The Documents Above Top Secret. Former Department of Defense research librarian, Douglas Dietrich, provides information gained from handling top-secret documents about the incident in Roswell, NM. His account seems to confirm the rumors that the government was testing acquired WWII technology in New Mexico. Could Nick Redfern's thesis about Roswell, which he presented in Body Snatchers in the Desert, be correct after all? Dietrich can be seen in many other YouTube videos, beginning with Douglas Dietrich Responds To ATS comments! MUST SEE!!! part 1/12.
 

OakFieldAlienz444

Senior Member
Messages
3,295
As World War II ended, the race was on with the Soviet Union to seize as many German scientists as possible in anticipation of the Cold War. The full story has remained elusive until now. Operation Paperclip, by Annie Jacobsen, provides perhaps the most comprehensive, up-to-date narrative available to the general public. Her book is a detailed and highly readable account of the program. Jacobsen compiled extensive primary and secondary sources, duly annotated in over 100 pages of notes and bibliography. In it are many new sources, among them US government records (President Clinton’s “Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act”), German archival records, first-person accounts, memoirs, and letters. The book also contains a useful index and biographies of the principal players.

Jacobsen offers a detailed chronology of events related to Operation Paperclip. Because of its scope and the introduction of so many characters, the narrative could have been improved if the author had focused on a shorter list than the 89 individuals profiled and maintained more topical continuity. Nevertheless, the book is a compelling work with interesting historical and personal revelations, for example:

  • One of the most notorious cases of WMD proliferation occurred on 15 May 1945, when the German U-234 submarine, bound for Japan, was captured off Newfoundland by the USS Sutton. The U-boat carried Dr. Heinz Schlicke, Director of Naval Test Fields at Kiel, and the cargo included plans for the Hs293 glider bomb, V-1 glide bomb (forerunner to cruise missiles), V-2 rocket (forerunner to the SCUD missile), Me262 fighter aircraft (the first combat jet fighter), low observable submarine designs, and lead-lined boxes filled with 1,200 lbs. of uranium oxide, a key ingredient of atomic bombs. Schlicke, who claimed to be an electronic warfare expert, became a prisoner at Ft. Meade, MD.
  • Sarin was produced at Dyhernfurth (Dyhernfurth later fell into Russian hands). Its name derives from the initials of its developers: Gerhard Schrader and Otto Ambros from the infamous IG Farben chemical company—maker of the killing gases used at concentration camps—and from the names of two German Army officers.
  • Schrader tells the story of inventing “tabun,” a nerve agent named after the English word “taboo.” The Germans called it 9/91 and, after their defeat at Stalingrad, seriously considered using it on the Russians.
Henry Wallace, former vice president and secretary of commerce, believed the scientists’ ideas could launch new civilian industries and produce jobs. Indeed, German scientists developed synthetic rubber (used in automobile tires), non-running hosiery, the ear thermometer, electromagnetic tape, and miniaturized electrical components, to name a few.

Werner von Braun is well known to those who remember the Apollo moon landing. During the Ford administration, von Braun was almost awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom—until one of Ford’s senior advisors, David Gergen, objected to his Nazi past.

Less well known is that another 120 fellow German scientists, engineers, and technicians developed the Saturn V launch vehicle, or that the Launch Operations Center at Cape Canaveral, Florida, was headed by Kurt Debus, an ardent Nazi. The Vertical Assembly Building—bigger in volume than the Pentagon and almost as tall as the Washington Monument—was designed by Bernhard Tessmann, former facilities designer at the German missile launch facility at Peenemuende.

Other prominent Nazis hired under Operation Paperclip included:

  • Dr. Hubertus Strughold, who played an important role in space medicine by developing space suits and other life-support systems. In June 1948, he put a rhesus monkey named Albert in the pressurized nosecone of a V-2 rocket in a pressurized nose cone, the first step in the effort to send humans to space.
  • General Reinhard Gehlen, former head of Nazi intelligence operations against the Soviets, was hired by the US Army and later by the CIA to operate 600 ex-Nazi agents in the Soviet zone of occupied Germany. In 1948, CIA Director Roscoe Hillenkoetter assumed control of the so-called Gehlen Organization.
  • German biologist Dr. Kurt Blome was hired to develop offensive and defensive capabilities to counter Soviet biological warfare activities.
In 1949, the CIA created the Office of Scientific Intelligence. Its first director, Dr. Willard Machle, traveled to Germany to set up a special program to interrogate Soviet spies. The CIA believed the Russians had developed mind-control programs and wanted to know how US spies would hold up against this capability if caught. He also aimed to explore the feasibility of creating a “Manchurian candidate” through behavioral modification. Thus, Operation Bluebird was born. Bluebird, later called MKULTRA, was a research activity experimenting in behavioral engineering of humans. The Nuremberg Code prohibits experimentation with humans without their consent. During this program, Dr. Frank Olson, a US Army biological weapons researcher, was given the drug LSD without his knowledge, leading to his death by leaping from a building. DCI Richard Helms ordered much of the documentation destroyed, and the circumstances of his demise remain controversial to this day.

Although she understandably questions the morality of the decision to hire Nazi SS scientists, Jacobsen balances her judgment with an understanding of the perceived threat of the Soviet Union under Stalin and the communists’ dialectical determination to prepare for total war with the West. The Soviets similarly captured and used German scientists for their own defense programs. That side of the story is not covered in this book.

Jacobsen provides insights on joint intelligence coordination and cooperation among US services and Allies; operational deconfliction; document and foreign materiel acquisition and exploitation; interrogation techniques; active tracking; production of foreign intelligence; surveillance and countersurveillance methods; and negotiating the sometimes conflicting objectives of the judiciary and the Intelligence Community (i.e., “hang them” vs. “hire them!”)
 

OakFieldAlienz444

Senior Member
Messages
3,295
The following is an extract from Paul Langely's paper “RADIATION SURVEYS OF HIROSHIMA CONDUCTED BY
JAPANESE SCIENTISTS IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE ATOMIC BOMBING – IMPLICATIONS FOR SURVIVORS, NUCLEAR VETERANS AND THE CONDUCT OF MODERN WARFARE”
, 2008.

The descriptions discussed here are sourced from the article “Historical Sketch of the Scientific Field Survey in Hiroshima Several Days after the Bombing” by Prof Sakae Shimizu, 1982, published by Bulletin of the Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Volume 60, (2), 1982

Professor Shimizu notes that en route to Hiroshima to conduct a survey “At Kyoto Station they learnt that the USSR had entered the war and had penetrated Manchuria and Japanese Southern Sakhalin.” (Bulletin, Page 43)

The movement of Soviet forces into China threatened Japanese Biological and Chemical Weapons test facilities in China. Generally known as Unit 731, the Japanese terror weapon program was wide ranging, consisting of many facilities in Asia.

The formation of this bio-chem programme had its roots in Japan’s 1925 refusal to accept the Geneva Convention Ban on biological weapons. (Source: ”Factories of Death,” by Sheldon H. Harris (Rutledge, 1994) and ”Prisoners of the Japanese: POWS of World War II in the Pacific,” by Gavan Daws (William Morrow, 1994))
The Headquarters for the bio-chem programme in Japan was located in Hiroshima Prefecture. Its location, on Okunojima island, was top secret. It produced chemical weapons munitions. The island is located approximately 50 km from Hiroshima City. See map above.

Okunoshima Island is a 20 minute Ferry Ride from Takehara City. It is located in the Seto Inland Sea. It takes 1 1/2 hours on bus or train to travel from Hiroshima to Takehara City. In total, 6,616 tons of gas was produced on the island from 1929 until Japan’s defeat in 1945. The island was chosen for its distance from major cities and its secluded location. The army went as far as erasing the island from unclassified maps in 1938 to protect its location. (Source: NgApike -official Japan tourist guide).

“Medical Experiments” and the testing of these bio-chem weapons caused the deaths of both civilians and POWs in camps such as Unit 731. Japan also used these munitions against Chinese cities. The total death toll was very great and the programme was carried out with great cruelty.

The United States responded to these inhumane outrages. On June 5, 1942, President Roosevelt issued a warning to Japan to cease the use of its biological and chemical weapons or “face retaliation in full measure”. (“A Preliminary Review: Studies of Japanese Biological Warfare Unit 731 in the United States” by Tien-wei Wu, Payday loans for a holiday - Nesa)

History shows that the United States of America stood by its word. At the same time however, the United States embarked upon its own biological and chemical weapon programme.

Members of the Japanese Biological and Chemical Weapons programme were prosecuted as war criminals if captured by Soviet forces. (Source: “World War II in the Pacific : Japanese Unit 731 Biological Warfare Unit” Unit 731.)

Those members from the same Units who surrendered to the United States were treated rather differently. These members were both an asset to the US and a liability to it. Information was gained and controlled.
In both the immediate post War era and during the Cold War, the nuclear superiority of the United States depended upon the security of its classified weapons data. That stood for all types of weapons, for the Soviet Union also gained access to the Japanese biological and chemical weapons data. Professor Shimizu and other Japanese nuclear surveyors held knowledge of the atomic bombs’ weapons effects which were Secrets of the United States.

The atomic bombing of Hiroshima City is shown to be a largely terror attack. The poison gas facilities on Okunoshima Island presented important, purely military, targets yet were ignored by Allied attack of any kind. Upon Allied Occupation of the facility, the Okunoshima technical and medical records relating to the production and use of poison gas was commandeered by the United States. (Source: http://www.defence.gov.au/army/AHU/books_articles/The Forgotten Force/ )

Today the Poison Gas Factory on Okunoshima Island is a museum which enjoys 52,000 visitors each year. There is no concrete evidence that the existence of the island’s facilities were the reason for the atomic attack upon Hiroshima city. (Source: The New York Times, August 12, 1995). Further research is required to determine the existence of any link between the weapons of mass destruction possessed by Japan and those used against it by the United States of America. For example, On August 9, 1945, Nagasaki was subjected to US atomic attack. However, Nagasaki was a secondary target. The primary target, Kokura was not attacked due to cloud cover.

The New York Times of August 7, 1995 reported: “The city (Kokura) was also the place where chemical weapons were secretly assembled for Japan’s army. The Kyodo news agency recently turned up once-classified American military documents that show that by July 2, 1945, Washington knew that chemical weapons were being made in Kokura.”
The same source states that Kokura was the secondary target if the atomic attack upon Hiroshima was prevented by conditions.

There is a logical link between the manufacture of poison chemicals on Okunoshima Island, their transport to Kokura for assembly into munitions and the atomic attack targeting priorities of the United States.
There is a need to discover the state of US knowledge of Japanese chemical weapons logistics and transport in order to determine why the purely military target of Okunoshima Island was not considered a priority while predominately civilian cities were incinerated and contaminated by atomic bombs. The record shows that the bulk of the casualties from the Hiroshima bomb were civilian. The Japanese military withstood the attack with sufficient resilience and resource to mount the actions of rescue, survey and recovery with the sophistication described by Professor Shimizu. Despite the attacks, Japan’s chemical weapons arsenal remained intact.

THE FATE OF JAPANESE BIOLOGICAL, CHEMICAL AND NUCLEAR RESEARCHERS UNDER THE US COMMAND

In exchange for information relating to Japan’s biological and chemical warfare data held by Unit 731, Lt. Col. Ryoichi Naito of that Unit, was granted war crimes immunity by the United States. He was appointed head of Green Cross, one of Japan’s top pharmaceutical companies. Other Unit 731 leaders joined him there. (Source: “Japan’s Germ Warfare and the Korean War” Lee Wha Rang, July 27, 1996. See also Dick Russell’s book, “The Man Who Knew Too Much”.) China remains sensitive to the continued under reporting of such events.
Shimizu, a member of the defunct F-go naval atomic bomb project, though innocent of any crime, was vulnerable to the dictates of the Occupation Authorities. As previously noted, the US confiscated the Hiroshima survey notes and other evidence. No doubt Shimizu and others had to remain compliant to information control and political sensitivities between Japan and the US in order to be employable in their positions.

Professor Shimizu carried out a distinguished career. He achieved “Full Professor” in the Institute of Chemical Research, Kyoto University, and in 1952 he was appointed Director of the Laboratory of Nuclear Radiation (now, the Laboratory of Atomic and Nuclear Physics, Division of States and Structures). At the same time, beginning in 1953, he served as a Lecturer in Physics at the Konan University in Kobe, Japan.” (Source: OBITUARIES, Professor Dr Sakae Shimizu (July 18, 1915 to December 13, 2003) (Adapted by John Hubbell from obituary provided by Professor Yasuhito Isozumi, Kyoto University, also from a bio sketch by Professor Megumi Tashiro at the time of Professor. Shimizu’s retirement to emeritus status in 1979.”) http://www.canberra.edu.au/irps/Archives/vol17no3/obituaries.html)
The National Interest of the US determined many outcomes in the Post War era. Many documents relating to fallout and radiation remained classified until President Clinton’s Executive Order of the 1990s. (The DOE Openness Project). Such considerations may account for the lack of alpha data in Shimizu’s paper.

In November 10th 1999 the US Senate debated the Japanese Imperial Army Disclosure Act of 1999”. In the course of debate Mrs. Feinstein stated in part : “This legislation will require the disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act classified records and documents in the possession of the U.S. Government regarding chemical and biological experiments carried out by Japan during the course of the Second World War……. This legislation is needed because although the Second World War ended over fifty years ago–and with it Japan’s chemical and biological weapons experimentation programs–many of the records and documents regarding Japan’s wartime activities remain classified and hidden in U.S. Government archives and repositories.

Even worse, according to some scholars, some of these records are now being inadvertently destroyed… The world is entitled to a full and complete record of what did transpire…… Professor Sheldon’s letter goes on to discuss three examples of the destruction of documents relating to chemical and biological warfare experiments that he is aware of:

At Dugway Proving Grounds in Utah, at Fort Detrick in Maryland, and at the Pentagon.” (Source: Congressional Record: November 10, 1999 (Senate) Page S14533-S14571 STATEMENTS ON INTRODUCED BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS By Mrs. FEINSTEIN: S. 1902).

The United States utilized the Japanese Biological and Chemical weapons data. It kept that data secret. It developed and built its own arsenal of similar weapons. This arsenal complimented the US nuclear arsenal.
Likewise, the 1945 Japanese Hiroshima survey data was confiscated, kept secret for many years. To my knowledge, the Shimizu survey report has never been returned to Japan.

Those Japanese personnel involved the Biological and Chemical weapons programmes and who complied with US terms were rewarded with careers and in cash. The cash amounted to 40 million yen in current value. A US document states “data on human experiments may prove invaluable” and said the information was “only obtainable through the skilful, psychological approach to top-flight pathologists” involved in Unit 731 experiments.” (Source: Australian Broadcasting Commission media report : “US paid for Japanese human germ warfare data” Monday, August 15, 2005. Report cites the findings of researcher Keiichi Tsuneishi, Professor at Kanagawa University).

The silence of the Japanese early surveys was easier to assure. Confiscation of data, and censorship of Japanese reporting.

Many surveys and studies were conducted by the Japanese after the survey detailed by Shimizu. The total Japanese survey and study effort, including documents, bodies and body parts, soil and other samples, were confiscated by US Occupation Forces. These were slowly returned to Japan in the years following the signing of the Peace Treaty between Japan and the US in 1952*. Press and scientific publication of Japanese research was censored by the US until 1952. Prior to this the Imperial Japanese censorship existed.

(The latest reported return of documents by the US to Japan occurred in 2006 (Source: China Plus, CRI English; http://www.chugoku-np.co.jp/abom/2006e/kyodo/Ak06080301.html The Chugoku Shimbun Peace News 2006 )
(*The signing of the Peace Treaty occurred 7 years after the signing of the Surrender document.)

Prof. Shimizu: “In the morning of the 20 November in our laboratory room where the Cockcroft-Walton machine was in operation and a room where a cyclotron was under construction were occupied by the Occupation Forces (about 20 soldiers directed by an officer), and we were forbidden to enter these rooms.
Three days later our cyclotron was smashed away, and in addition, unfortunately some valuable records and data of our early studies on the Hiroshima disaster were confiscated by them and have never been returned.” (Shimizu, page 52 of the Bulletin).

MODERN JAPANESE STUDIES WHICH FIND FISSION FALLOUT PRODUCTS IN HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI SOIL SAMPLES
On page 49 of the Bulletin paper, Shimizu states that no radio chemical analysis was undertaken of the collected samples he studied. He states that “more than twenty years later, from these area some long-life fission products were identified.”
The return of material confiscated by the US to Japan has been a slow and ongoing process. This time delay does not explain why Japanese researchers studying returned soil and other samples from Hiroshima and Nagasaki have found fission products while Shimizu reports that in 1945 he found neutron induced beta radiation, “no acceptable alpha” and acknowledges fission fallout only in areas affected by the Black Rain.

The Japan Times reports the following:

Friday, Aug. 4, 2006

Notes on Japan A-bomb program found
Two scientists’ notebooks in U.S. cast light on little-understood project

WASHINGTON (Kyodo) The U.S. Library of Congress has two books of notes written by two scientists involved in Japan’s unsuccessful attempt to develop atomic bombs during the war, it was learned recently.

News photo
The notebooks of Sakae Shimizu and Yoshiaki Uemura, scientists involved in Japan’s program to develop atomic bombs during the war, were recently found in the U.S. Library of Congress in Washington. KYODO PHOTO

Sakae Shimizu and Yoshiaki Uemura worked under Bunsaku Arakatsu, a professor at Kyoto Imperial University — now Kyoto University — ordered by the Imperial Japanese Navy to develop atomic bombs, according to the two notebooks, copies of which were obtained by Kyodo News.

The notebooks were seized by the General Headquarters of the Allied Forces during the postwar Occupation. They have been kept with other wartime Japanese documents and not sorted and indexed to date at the library in the U.S. capital.

Discovered 61 years after the United States dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, the notebooks likely will give significant insight into Japan’s wartime nuclear program, about which little is known. There are few notes left written by scientists involved at such a high level in Japan’s A-bomb program.

The library has more than 10,000 wartime Japanese documents that have not been cataloged, according to research by Kyodo News and Keiichi Tsuneishi, a professor at Kanagawa University.

Among them are the two notebooks — one with about 220 pages of notes written by Shimizu and the other with about 75 pages written by Uemura. The notes date from before Japan began full-fledged efforts to develop atomic bombs.

Shimizu, who later was named a professor emeritus at Kyoto University, was involved in the production of a cyclotron, an accelerator used for experiments on nuclear reactions.

His notebook, with the title “Laboratory Notes 2,” details the development of the high-voltage accelerator from 1942.

Shimizu, who died in 2003 at 88, visited Hiroshima soon after the atomic bomb was dropped there as part of an academic survey mission.

He also is known for his analysis of dust on the Japanese fishing boat Fukuryu Maru No. 5 that proved the vessel had been exposed to radiation in 1954 from a U.S. hydrogen-bomb test at Bikini Atoll, part of the Marshall Islands.

Uemura, who later became a professor at Kyoto University, made notes on the research he did in his notebook, “Research Diary,” starting in 1941, including research on nuclear reactions when metal is exposed to gamma rays.

His notes show that it was decided on June 14, 1941, to build a cyclotron and that a comparison was made with the results of testing done by Danish physicist Niels Bohr, who worked on the Manhattan Project, Washington’s secret atomic-bomb project.

The U.S. succeeded in developing the first atomic bomb and was the first to use one, on Hiroshima on Aug. 6, 1945, and another one on Nagasaki three days later.

Japanese scientists recognized the potential of using atomic energy to develop a powerful new bomb even before the war.

While the navy commissioned the Arakatsu laboratory to undertake research, the Imperial Japanese Army also ordered a laboratory headed by Yoshio Nishina at Riken, a national research institute for physical and chemical sciences, to develop an atomic bomb.

The Arakatsu laboratory tried to enrich uranium using a centrifuge but was not successful before the war ended. However, both programs failed. end quote . Japan Times, http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20060804a2.html

All Japanese bomb projects ceased in July 1945. Occupation Forces might well have considered Prof Shimizu’s research a part of Japan’s wider “Special Weapons” projects, associating the nuclear research data (which was confined to laboratory level research with an amount of refined uranium sufficient only to cover a postage stamp) with the Japanese biological and chemical weapons program (as produced and used by Unit 731).

This may account for the retention by the USA of Shimizu’s laboratory research notes – which are of a fundamental reseach nature. The Shimizu radiological survey records however are not related to Japanese WW2 abortive nuclear weapons programs. Rather they relate to the effects suffered by the overwhelmingly civilian population of Hiroshima as a result of the US use of a nuclear weapon against that city. It seems to me that the United States should release the Shimizu Hiroshima survey report into the public domain as soon as possible.

Recent sources of papers, dating from 1972, analyzing samples collected by the early Japanese survey teams and which identify fission fallout products in Hiroshima and Nagasaki include:
Cesium-137 in Placentae, Urine, Food and Rain in Hiroshima. Papers Health Physics. 22(3):251-256, March 1972. Takeshita, K.; Antoku, S.; Sunayashiki, T.; Tabuchi, A.
Health Phys. 1989 Dec;57(6):1013-6. Fallout in the hypocenter area of the Hiroshima atomic bomb.Shizuma K, Iwatani K, Hasai H, Hoshi M.Faculty of Engineering, Hiroshima University, Japan.
Health Phys. 1990 May;58 (5):591-6. Measurement of 239Pu in soil and plants in the Nishiyama District of Nagasaki. Okajima S, Shimasaki T, Kubo T.Atomic Disease Institute, Nagasaki University School of Medicine, Japan.
J Radiat Res (Tokyo). 1991 Mar;32 Suppl:32-9.
Studies of radioactivity produced by the Hiroshima atomic bomb: 2. Measurements of fallout radioactivity.Hasai H, Hoshi M, Yokoro K.Faculty of Engineering, Hiroshima University, Japan.
137Cs Concentration in Soil Samples from an Early Survey of Hiroshima Atomic Bomb and Cumulative Dose Estimation from the Fallout. Papers
Health Physics. 71(3):340-346, September 1996.Shizuma, Kiyoshi; Iwatani, Kazuo; Hasai, Hiromi; Hoshi, Masaharu; Oka, Takamitsu;Okano, Masaharu
Nippon Genshiryoku Kenkyujo JAERI,Conf(2003) Uranium isotope analyses of soilsamples collected from Nisshoen, Hiroshima-Implication on the fate of U-235discharged from the Hiroshima A-bomb Accession number;03A0757641 Author;FUJIKAWA Y(Kyoto Univ., Osaka, Jpn) SHIZUMA K(Hiroshima Univ., Higashi-hiroshima, Jpn) ENDO S(Hiroshima Univ., Higashi-hiroshima, Jpn) IKEDA E(Kyoto
Univ., Osaka, Jpn) FUKUI M(Kyoto Univ., Osaka, Jpn) Journal Title;Nippon Genshiryoku Kenkyujo JAERI,Conf Journal Code:L2150A ISSN: VOL.;NO.;PAGE.314-319(2003) Figure&Table&Reference;FIG.5, REF.8 Pub. Country;Japan Language;English
Cesium 137 decays by Beta and Gamma radiation. (Source: CDC Radiation Emergencies | Radioisotope Brief: Cesium-137 http://www.bt.cdc.gov/radiation/isotopes/cesium.asp)
Plutonium decays by Alpha radiation. (Source: CDC Radiation Emergencies | Radioisotope Brief: Plutonium-239. http://www.bt.cdc.gov/radiation/isotopes/plutonium.asp)
Uranium decays by Alpha radiation (Source: CDC Radiation Emergencies | Radioisotope Brief: Uranium-235, Uranium 238 http://www.bt.cdc.gov/radiation/isotopes/uranium.asp)

Lastly, here’s a link to the final victims of the weapons created with the aid of documents created by Japan’s Unit 731 and taken to the USA:
http://www.project-112shad-fdn.com/
 

Top