No Joke this time message from future

[Ike]

A space is just another character to a computer, and it reads a little differently. A space has it's own binary number(00100000) like any other character. And a computer doesn't need spaces to distinguish between characters.

For example: A computer will read it as "A" as soon as it reads the first 8 binary characters. It knows the next 8 characters is another letter, and so on.

01000001 = A

A computer sees a distinction that you do not. To you, AAA looks like this:

010000010100000101000001

But to a computer, it looks like this:

010000010100000101000001

In order for a typical human to distinguish between letters, they have to use spaces and see it like this:

01000001 01000001 01000001

...which is how the message in question is written out. Thus it appears that a human converted it rather than using a computerized converter. Because a computer would have written/interpreted the spacing differently.

It looks like someone took a table of the English alphabet with corresponding binary,...



...and typed it out as a human would interpret the spacing.

It could mean anything. I am merely noting an observation and forming a hypothesis.

Interesting nonetheless. Could be another clue to solving this mystery.

 

[Japrim]

Further, to clarify..,

From my observation of the present element of human perception, my hypothesis is that the message has a human origin. This is not such a complex thing, and although we did not actually witness a human typing the message, I think it is a safe assumption to call it obvious. A human wrote it, duh.

Now consider this in regard for being analytical; The message does not actually state that a human wrote it, but in terms of organizing our analyzing it, we can add to the message "A human wrote this."

(This comes in handy when you are trying to use reason/logic to sort out a monstrosity connect the dots kind of thing.)

The message becomes:

A human wrote this

00110010 00110000 00110010 00110001 01000100
01001111 01001110 01001111 01010100 01010010
01000101 01001100 01001001 01010110 01000101
01010100 01001000 01000101 01010011 01000001
01001101 01000101 01001101 01001001 01010011
01010100 01000001 01001011 01000101 01000011
01001100 01001001 01001110 01010100 01001111
01001110 01001000 01000001 01010011 01000100
01000101 01010011 01010100 01010010 01001111
01011001 01000101 01000100 01010101 01010011
01000001 01001100 01001100 00101110

 

[Japrim]

Does a computer care about politics? Maybe. If an AI program from the future were trying to alter the past, would it slander a politician from what it gathered through records? If it could, why not? So I suppose it is possible that a computer wrote it.

But would a computer understand something like human perception with spacing? Could it mimic humans from recording human interaction, in order to fool us? I suppose it could. Why not?

If an A.I. were trying to bash Hillary Clinton with an overall strategy of infiltrating past human social media like Facebook and Paranormalis, why would it not simply use English and state that it was a human from the year whatever and that it is warning us of disaster?

It stands to reason that if it were a computer mimicking humans, that if it was intelligent enough to form such a strategy, it would do as humans do, and not use binary.

So, since it is probably from humans, why would a human need to use binary to bash Clinton and warn us of a future disaster? If you are trying to get a message out to everyone, why the need to encrypt it in binary? Does that not appear a bit counter-intuitive? Why use binary?

And why use binary anyway? It is obvious and easy to decipher. There is no real protection there.

Is there another message hidden within using a different form of encryption?

What can we learn from analyzing it?

 

[Ike]

Does a computer care about politics? Maybe. If an AI program from the future were trying to alter the past, would it slander a politician from what it gathered through records? If it could, why not? So I suppose it is possible that a computer wrote it.

But would a computer understand something like human perception with spacing? Could it mimic humans from recording human interaction, in order to fool us? I suppose it could. Why not?

If an A.I. were trying to bash Hillary Clinton with an overall strategy of infiltrating past human social media like Facebook and Paranormalis, why would it not simply use English and state that it was a human from the year whatever and that it is warning us of disaster?

It stands to reason that if it were a computer mimicking humans, that if it was intelligent enough to form such a strategy, it would do as humans do, and not use binary.

So, since it is probably from humans, why would a human need to use binary to bash Clinton and warn us of a future disaster? If you are trying to get a message out to everyone, why the need to encrypt it in binary? Does that not appear a bit counter-intuitive? Why use binary?

And why use binary anyway? It is obvious and easy to decipher. There is no real protection there.

Is there another message hidden within using a different form of encryption?

What can we learn from analyzing it?

Maybe it was sent using a machine that could only use binary? I don't know how old computers worked of even a machine exists

 

[Tron1]

Are there any computer type's in the 1880's that anyone from the future left behind?

 

[Tron1]

who exactly are you japrim? you've been replying to me over a thing i posted.

 

[Japrim]

who exactly are you japrim? you've been replying to me over a thing i posted.

I am a human using the name Japrim.

Yes, I have been replying to this thread, contributing to the discussion. I posed the question of indications that it may be authentic. Ike suggested...

So let's analyze this. Ok.

...and I agree.

So, I have been analyzing it a little. Who knows what we may discover if we contemplate enough questions and dig into it?

 

[steven chiverton]

How can we authenticate said message? How do we know it was from the future?

easy online you can access a binary decoder

 

[Japrim]

How can we authenticate said message? How do we know it was from the future?

easy online you can access a binary decoder

Binary to Text (ASCII) Conversion

Of course you can. But that does not adequately demonstrate it came from the future. So what? It's written in binary.

I was merely noting the difference in spacing of how the binary was written. It looks like a human wrote it rather than a computer because a comp reads it differently.

Ike suggested we analyze it, which essentially amounts to using what we know as facts and building a data base from whatever information we can deduce/induce and infer about or from those facts. ..like a puzzle.

Okay, so it likely originates from a human for the reasons I have explained about interpretation of spacing. What else can we deduce induce or infer about said message? What are the facts?

 

[tflofasho]

who exactly are you japrim? you've been replying to me over a thing i posted.

I am a human using the name Japrim.

Yes, I have been replying to this thread, contributing to the discussion. I posed the question of indications that it may be authentic. Ike suggested...

So let's analyze this. Ok.

...and I agree.

So, I have been analyzing it a little. Who knows what we may discover if we contemplate enough questions and dig into it?

Ok, so how do we know you're not with the feds? Your tone of voice and way you carry yourself typographically is very strange. Especially when you're obviously replying to active members with information and asking and pressing for questions that you really want to get in on.

Then again, I wouldn't be surprised if the feds are already on here monitoring this site for information they can't wait to come and dismantle. They're all over the place and even posting as probably some user with a scenester mindset.