dh1
I can see you are someone that likes to connect the dots. All I would like to see you do is use real facts instead of the fiction we are taught in school. There is a conspiracy in our schools to make sure no one comes out educated with factual science.
The concept of mass is part of that fiction. It isn't real. There is no mass in our universe. I challenge you to go out and measure the inertial mass of an object undergoing an inertial acceleration. It's never been done. Because you can't measure make believe.
Same thing with a scalar wave. A scalar and a wave are opposites. Any wave is a vector phenomena. It requires the passage of time. A scalar wave might as well be the same thing as pixie dust. It's not real. It's make believe. No one ever built anything with make believe science. Believing something will not make it real.
What about time phenomena? That seems to be what is being covered up with fiction. From my observations there seems to be more than one kind of time. And so far nothing has altered the local flow of time. Different time based clocks behave differently when moved away from the earth. Yet all we are told is atomic based clocks say time flows slower in low earth orbit, and faster in high earth orbit. With no proof at all that an atomic clock is actually measuring the flow of real time.
Do you really believe gravity bends light? Still no earthly experiment exists to prove this yet. It's been pointed out that the sun's atmosphere is responsible for the bending of light making objects behind the sun appear visible.
Even CERN appears to be aligning itself with this fictional science we are taught. The announcement of gravity waves being detected has to be pure fiction just based on local observable facts.
It's becoming very obvious to me that a tremendous effort is being put forth to make sure we don't use real scientific facts to understand anything. Maybe because the real facts once known are too dangerous.
Ya got tunnel vision Einstein. Clusters of galaxies are known to bend light passing through the empty space between them due to gravity. No atmosphere present there.
Scalar waves I agree is a term that is used incorrectly. Should be replaced with the term 'longitudinal wave' or 'standing longitudinal wave' Those are just waves of pressure which is implied by the term scalar wave as well.