Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
2004 Elections
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Anoah" data-source="post: 9192" data-attributes="member: 16"><p><strong>2004 Elections</strong></p><p></p><p>.</p><p></p><p>I have always understood staunch libertarians as having a "hands off" type of policy. US troops on US soil to defend the good ole USA. I once saw a libertarian slogan that says "why doesnt Switzerland ever get attacked by terrorists? Because they dont abuse people and create problems, they stay the hell out of it." I see this attitude leading a lot of libertarians to have an anti-war stance. Their intense distrust and dislike of government probably also leads them to believe that this war must be "unjustified" because all government does is lie and mislead. I have met libertarians who are pro-war and ones who are very opposed to it. I think its the neo-cons who would love to send nukes flying everywhere. </p><p></p><p>As far as the draft goes: Bush doesnt have a choice. The war will expand big time, the casualties mount, there will be a shortage of troops and they will be spread to thin. This will cause us to have a draft whether we have Bush or Kerry in office probably. I understand all the reasons that a draft would be a horrendous move for Bush or Kerry to make, and all of the problems it will create (many more than it will solve) but they have absolutely no choice if they want to pursue this war.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Anoah, post: 9192, member: 16"] [b]2004 Elections[/b] . I have always understood staunch libertarians as having a "hands off" type of policy. US troops on US soil to defend the good ole USA. I once saw a libertarian slogan that says "why doesnt Switzerland ever get attacked by terrorists? Because they dont abuse people and create problems, they stay the hell out of it." I see this attitude leading a lot of libertarians to have an anti-war stance. Their intense distrust and dislike of government probably also leads them to believe that this war must be "unjustified" because all government does is lie and mislead. I have met libertarians who are pro-war and ones who are very opposed to it. I think its the neo-cons who would love to send nukes flying everywhere. As far as the draft goes: Bush doesnt have a choice. The war will expand big time, the casualties mount, there will be a shortage of troops and they will be spread to thin. This will cause us to have a draft whether we have Bush or Kerry in office probably. I understand all the reasons that a draft would be a horrendous move for Bush or Kerry to make, and all of the problems it will create (many more than it will solve) but they have absolutely no choice if they want to pursue this war. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
2004 Elections
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top