Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
2004 Elections
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Unintentional" data-source="post: 9223" data-attributes="member: 22"><p><strong>2004 Elections</strong></p><p></p><p>To Fringam:Bush didn't choose this war. Sadam did. </p><p></p><p>Did Bush promise not to touch social security? If he did he would have been the only president since the creation of social security to not treat FICA funds as part of the general funds. </p><p></p><p>It was Bush who finally got a prescription component of medicare (medicaid?). </p><p></p><p>I'm glad he choose to invade Afganistan. Should we not retaliate when openly attacked?</p><p></p><p>US popularity throughout the world is basically the same the day he took office, except for extremist muslim countries (the numbers are even lower and I could care less). </p><p></p><p>Bush has basically done the same, if not better for the environment as every other president (ever hear of his "Clear skies Initiative" or are you talking about him rescinding Clintons 7-year-11-month-into-his-term of reducing arsenic levels that would not have even taken place until 2006, in which case Bush did not increase levels but put them at the same level they were the entire term of Clinton and all previous administrations). </p><p></p><p>Maybe tax cuts for the rich were massive, but their contribution to the tax base is massive. The top 15% earns 33% of all income, but pay 53% of all taxes. Did they 53% of the total tax cut? Nope, they got less. They got screwed. </p><p></p><p>In 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003 there were 142, 143, 144, 146 million employed Americans respectfully. How is that exploding unemployment? Especially since unemployment is now 5.4%, lower than the average unemployment in all the 90s?</p><p></p><p>Foreign extremist muslims SHOULD be mistrusted. </p><p></p><p>The world economy has chosen oil. Do you hate the world economy?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Unintentional, post: 9223, member: 22"] [b]2004 Elections[/b] To Fringam:Bush didn't choose this war. Sadam did. Did Bush promise not to touch social security? If he did he would have been the only president since the creation of social security to not treat FICA funds as part of the general funds. It was Bush who finally got a prescription component of medicare (medicaid?). I'm glad he choose to invade Afganistan. Should we not retaliate when openly attacked? US popularity throughout the world is basically the same the day he took office, except for extremist muslim countries (the numbers are even lower and I could care less). Bush has basically done the same, if not better for the environment as every other president (ever hear of his "Clear skies Initiative" or are you talking about him rescinding Clintons 7-year-11-month-into-his-term of reducing arsenic levels that would not have even taken place until 2006, in which case Bush did not increase levels but put them at the same level they were the entire term of Clinton and all previous administrations). Maybe tax cuts for the rich were massive, but their contribution to the tax base is massive. The top 15% earns 33% of all income, but pay 53% of all taxes. Did they 53% of the total tax cut? Nope, they got less. They got screwed. In 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003 there were 142, 143, 144, 146 million employed Americans respectfully. How is that exploding unemployment? Especially since unemployment is now 5.4%, lower than the average unemployment in all the 90s? Foreign extremist muslims SHOULD be mistrusted. The world economy has chosen oil. Do you hate the world economy? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
2004 Elections
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top