Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
2004 Elections
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CaryP" data-source="post: 9230" data-attributes="member: 34"><p><strong>2004 Elections</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Spoken like a true fascist. World politics is not the wild west or the feud between the Hatfields and the McCoys. What if every nation said the same thing? WW III here we come. Threatening other world governments is not the way to garner support for your agenda. How many other countries were doing the same thing? At least dozens. Why haven't we attacked them? Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Jordan, Egypt, Iran, Yemen, No. Korea, a multitude of African nations - and this one is likely to stir up some crap - Israel, all harbor and support terrorists. Not officially of course, but terrorists are known to operate out of all those countries. Why haven't we attacked and invaded those countries? Because Bush has been wanting a war and invasion of Iraq since before he was president. Hell, we used to support Hussein back when he was fighting Iran. We supported OBL when he was fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan. We still support Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait and Israel. What are we supposed to do attack ourselves? Makes no sense. Bush wanted a war with Iraq and lied his way into it. </p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>So if some country like France says give us Dick Cheney because of the bribery scandal there that's still being investigated, we should just give him up? That'd be my response, but it's never going to happen. What about the lawsuits and investigations in several south American countries against Henry Kissenger for his involvement in death squads and torture of dissenters? No, he didn't personally participate, but he authorized a lot of it. Negroponte, our current "Ambassador" to Iraq, was the front man through the State Dept. (CIA) in Latin America back in the 70's when the atrocities took place. Kissenger authorized all kinds of "bad acts" and Negroponte carried them out while there. Should we just give him up to them? Ain't gonna happen either. OBL has never, I repeat NEVER claimed responsibility for 9/11. The video tape that was paraded around of him claiming so was a fake. The guy in the video was close, but on close (not even that close) inspection, it's obvious it wasn't OBL in the tape. Independent Arabic translators who listened to the audio, couldn't confirm what was said because the sound quality was so bad. Very much dittohead propaganda about OBL's claim of accountability on 9/11 Sue. </p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Dick Cheney is probably going to be indicted in France for his involvement in bribes over Iraq when he was CEO of Haliburton. He wasn't taking them, but he sure was giving them out. So what if a bunch of French executives and politicians were taking bribes from Iraq. You think bribes are a rare occurence around the world? They happen on a daily basis. And yeah, Saddam had the resolutions that were broken. But it should tell you something that our "Coalition of the Bought and Paid For" was the same thing. We paid off those countries willing to take our money to be included in the "coalition", but since it was the US govt. no problem, right? Same damned thing. Iraq was bribing those who would help. The US did the same damned thing. Who's more or less guilty? It's just politics - been that way for a long time. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Yes, you're right Sue, but the wealthy is mostly populated with white men, who are Christian (at least in pretense). Have you talked to many Muslims who immigrated here and still have an accent? They're not feeling so welcome here these days. And yes, terrorists threatening to strike the US at home or abroad should not be trusted. Kinda obvious. </p><p> </p><p>Sue, I really like you and respect you, but you been drinking the Republican Kool Aid way too long. Don't accept the propaganda at face value. The govt. and those who aspire to rise to the top echelons are well practiced in the arts of lying, twisting the truth, propaganda, and misdirection for their own self-interests. And those interests ain't yours. Try googling some of what I've been telling you instead of listening to a steady diet of Rush Limbaugh. The boy's a show biz dope head. He ain't got your best interest at heart either. </p><p> </p><p>Cary</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CaryP, post: 9230, member: 34"] [b]2004 Elections[/b] Spoken like a true fascist. World politics is not the wild west or the feud between the Hatfields and the McCoys. What if every nation said the same thing? WW III here we come. Threatening other world governments is not the way to garner support for your agenda. How many other countries were doing the same thing? At least dozens. Why haven't we attacked them? Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Jordan, Egypt, Iran, Yemen, No. Korea, a multitude of African nations - and this one is likely to stir up some crap - Israel, all harbor and support terrorists. Not officially of course, but terrorists are known to operate out of all those countries. Why haven't we attacked and invaded those countries? Because Bush has been wanting a war and invasion of Iraq since before he was president. Hell, we used to support Hussein back when he was fighting Iran. We supported OBL when he was fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan. We still support Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait and Israel. What are we supposed to do attack ourselves? Makes no sense. Bush wanted a war with Iraq and lied his way into it. So if some country like France says give us Dick Cheney because of the bribery scandal there that's still being investigated, we should just give him up? That'd be my response, but it's never going to happen. What about the lawsuits and investigations in several south American countries against Henry Kissenger for his involvement in death squads and torture of dissenters? No, he didn't personally participate, but he authorized a lot of it. Negroponte, our current "Ambassador" to Iraq, was the front man through the State Dept. (CIA) in Latin America back in the 70's when the atrocities took place. Kissenger authorized all kinds of "bad acts" and Negroponte carried them out while there. Should we just give him up to them? Ain't gonna happen either. OBL has never, I repeat NEVER claimed responsibility for 9/11. The video tape that was paraded around of him claiming so was a fake. The guy in the video was close, but on close (not even that close) inspection, it's obvious it wasn't OBL in the tape. Independent Arabic translators who listened to the audio, couldn't confirm what was said because the sound quality was so bad. Very much dittohead propaganda about OBL's claim of accountability on 9/11 Sue. Dick Cheney is probably going to be indicted in France for his involvement in bribes over Iraq when he was CEO of Haliburton. He wasn't taking them, but he sure was giving them out. So what if a bunch of French executives and politicians were taking bribes from Iraq. You think bribes are a rare occurence around the world? They happen on a daily basis. And yeah, Saddam had the resolutions that were broken. But it should tell you something that our "Coalition of the Bought and Paid For" was the same thing. We paid off those countries willing to take our money to be included in the "coalition", but since it was the US govt. no problem, right? Same damned thing. Iraq was bribing those who would help. The US did the same damned thing. Who's more or less guilty? It's just politics - been that way for a long time. Yes, you're right Sue, but the wealthy is mostly populated with white men, who are Christian (at least in pretense). Have you talked to many Muslims who immigrated here and still have an accent? They're not feeling so welcome here these days. And yes, terrorists threatening to strike the US at home or abroad should not be trusted. Kinda obvious. Sue, I really like you and respect you, but you been drinking the Republican Kool Aid way too long. Don't accept the propaganda at face value. The govt. and those who aspire to rise to the top echelons are well practiced in the arts of lying, twisting the truth, propaganda, and misdirection for their own self-interests. And those interests ain't yours. Try googling some of what I've been telling you instead of listening to a steady diet of Rush Limbaugh. The boy's a show biz dope head. He ain't got your best interest at heart either. Cary [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
2004 Elections
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top