Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
2004 Elections
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Unintentional" data-source="post: 9231" data-attributes="member: 22"><p><strong>2004 Elections</strong></p><p></p><p>Sadam choose the war when he refused to comply with the cease fire from desert storm 1. He, Sadam, agreed to the cease fire. If you deny this, then explain the 17 resolutions which basically have the last 16 saying you better comply with the cease fire or else. Before you then say, we didn't give weapon's inspectors enough time or we didn't let them finish their job or we didn't (fill in the blank). The weapon inspectors job was to confirm Sadam compliance with his getting rid of his WMDs. Sadam was to get rid of them, and then prove it. What he did do was lie and refuse to prove anything. The weapons inspectors become "it" in a game of hide and seek with Sadam shutting doors, kicking them out and basically not cooperating in the slightest. This was not their job or duty. Sadam was to dismantle the WMD, document it, and then go to the inspectors and say look, "This is where they were, this is what we did to them, this is what is left of them, here is the documentation. It didn't happen. UN resolution 1441 which was unanimously approved by the security counsel, authorized the use of force if he did not begin to comply with agreements that he MADE OVER TEN YEARS AGO!</p><p></p><p>On 9-11 we were attacked by muslim extremist who based their operations out of Afganistan with the leave of the Taliban.</p><p></p><p>The US declared war on terrorism.</p><p></p><p>The Taliban refused to hand over Bin Laden. You know the rest of the story.</p><p></p><p>AFter 9-11, Sadam still refused to comply. He supports terrorism. The US is at war with terrorism and specifically countries that harbor them. The US had two crystal clear reasons and authorities to remove Sadam. You can be against this action, but it can't be denied that the US had good reason and the authority to remove Sadam from power.</p><p></p><p>As far as world popularity, the only non muslims countries with USA approval below 50% is German and France, no surprise since those countries both ran elections saying how much American sucks (Schoeder and Chirok). Prewar approval ratings are basically the same for muslim countries and their was no non-muslim country with approval ratings below 50%. However I am willing to concede that USA popularity is lower now than before the war, it is hardly alienating the rest of the world. Unless you consider German and France, the "rest of the world". I know Kerry doesn't think we have a "real" coalition because we don't have those two countries. (Sorry, Afghanistan, Albania, Angola, <strong>Australia</strong>, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, <strong>Colombia</strong>, Costa Rica, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Honduras, Hungary, <strong>Iceland</strong>, <strong>Italy</strong>, <strong>Japan</strong>, Kuwait, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Mongolia, Netherlands, Nicaragua, Pilau, Panama, Philippines, <strong>Poland</strong>, Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Singapore, Slovakia, Solomon Islands, South Korea, <strong>Spain</strong>, <strong>Turkey</strong>, Uganda, <strong>Ukraine</strong>, <strong>United Kingdom</strong>, Uzbekistan; haven't you heard? your guys aren't real according to Kerry. We've been alienating you. You can go home now. Because Germany and France didn't join us, we are all a joke. You don't count.</p><p></p><p>PS Maybe not all Muslims are terrorist, but all terrorists have been Muslim.</p><p></p><p>PPS Bush never said Iraq had WMDs. Please show one speech, one quote, one documented instance of where he said that. I know there are some web site with false quotes of him saying that, but when the original source is sought out, you will find he did not say that. It was always: he <em>could </em>have WMDs and he is non-compliant.</p><p></p><p>PPPS Top Al Queda members that have been captured have already admitted that we disrupted their plans for further attacks in the USA. They did not expect a response such as they got. (Gee, I wonder why....hmmm...Cole...US Embassies...First WTC bombing....etc...etc...) Take it for gospel truth: If we did nothing after 9-11 they would definitely have been more attacks in the USA coordinated by Al Queda in Afganistan with total approval of the Taliban. They have said so themselves.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Unintentional, post: 9231, member: 22"] [b]2004 Elections[/b] Sadam choose the war when he refused to comply with the cease fire from desert storm 1. He, Sadam, agreed to the cease fire. If you deny this, then explain the 17 resolutions which basically have the last 16 saying you better comply with the cease fire or else. Before you then say, we didn't give weapon's inspectors enough time or we didn't let them finish their job or we didn't (fill in the blank). The weapon inspectors job was to confirm Sadam compliance with his getting rid of his WMDs. Sadam was to get rid of them, and then prove it. What he did do was lie and refuse to prove anything. The weapons inspectors become "it" in a game of hide and seek with Sadam shutting doors, kicking them out and basically not cooperating in the slightest. This was not their job or duty. Sadam was to dismantle the WMD, document it, and then go to the inspectors and say look, "This is where they were, this is what we did to them, this is what is left of them, here is the documentation. It didn't happen. UN resolution 1441 which was unanimously approved by the security counsel, authorized the use of force if he did not begin to comply with agreements that he MADE OVER TEN YEARS AGO! On 9-11 we were attacked by muslim extremist who based their operations out of Afganistan with the leave of the Taliban. The US declared war on terrorism. The Taliban refused to hand over Bin Laden. You know the rest of the story. AFter 9-11, Sadam still refused to comply. He supports terrorism. The US is at war with terrorism and specifically countries that harbor them. The US had two crystal clear reasons and authorities to remove Sadam. You can be against this action, but it can't be denied that the US had good reason and the authority to remove Sadam from power. As far as world popularity, the only non muslims countries with USA approval below 50% is German and France, no surprise since those countries both ran elections saying how much American sucks (Schoeder and Chirok). Prewar approval ratings are basically the same for muslim countries and their was no non-muslim country with approval ratings below 50%. However I am willing to concede that USA popularity is lower now than before the war, it is hardly alienating the rest of the world. Unless you consider German and France, the "rest of the world". I know Kerry doesn't think we have a "real" coalition because we don't have those two countries. (Sorry, Afghanistan, Albania, Angola, [b]Australia[/b], Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, [b]Colombia[/b], Costa Rica, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Honduras, Hungary, [b]Iceland[/b], [b]Italy[/b], [b]Japan[/b], Kuwait, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Mongolia, Netherlands, Nicaragua, Pilau, Panama, Philippines, [b]Poland[/b], Portugal, Romania, Rwanda, Singapore, Slovakia, Solomon Islands, South Korea, [b]Spain[/b], [b]Turkey[/b], Uganda, [b]Ukraine[/b], [b]United Kingdom[/b], Uzbekistan; haven't you heard? your guys aren't real according to Kerry. We've been alienating you. You can go home now. Because Germany and France didn't join us, we are all a joke. You don't count. PS Maybe not all Muslims are terrorist, but all terrorists have been Muslim. PPS Bush never said Iraq had WMDs. Please show one speech, one quote, one documented instance of where he said that. I know there are some web site with false quotes of him saying that, but when the original source is sought out, you will find he did not say that. It was always: he [i]could [/i]have WMDs and he is non-compliant. PPPS Top Al Queda members that have been captured have already admitted that we disrupted their plans for further attacks in the USA. They did not expect a response such as they got. (Gee, I wonder why....hmmm...Cole...US Embassies...First WTC bombing....etc...etc...) Take it for gospel truth: If we did nothing after 9-11 they would definitely have been more attacks in the USA coordinated by Al Queda in Afganistan with total approval of the Taliban. They have said so themselves. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
2004 Elections
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top