Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
9/11 Revisited Again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CaryP" data-source="post: 21164" data-attributes="member: 34"><p><strong>Re: 9/11 Revisited Again</strong></p><p></p><p>Fair enough Darkwolf. I'd like to hear what he says. The evidence is still stacked to the side that says the towers shouldn't have collapsed IMO. The twin towers are the only steel structured buildings known to have collapsed from a fire. The jet fuel couldn't have lasted that long. An exploding airliner with close to full tanks would have had exploding fuel tanks turning the fuel into a vapor, which would have burned off quickly. The furnitrue, wall covering, paper etc. don't burn hot enough to melt or compromise a steel structure like the twin towers to the point of collapse within the short time it took them to collapse. WTC 7 was clearing "pulled" in a controlled demolition, and the managing partner (Larry Silverstein) of the entity that managed/owned the WTC complex clearly states as much in a PBS documentary "Rebuilding America." The north and south towers also appear to have been "pulled" in a controlled demolition after burning for a very short period of time. Thermite is the only thing I know of in my very limited knowledge of such things that could have accomplished this. There were pools of molten steel in the 7th basement of the two towers a few months after the attack. Normal combustables would have been smothered in this kind of oxygen starved environment. Thermite would not. Thanks for your input.</p><p></p><p>Cary</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CaryP, post: 21164, member: 34"] [b]Re: 9/11 Revisited Again[/b] Fair enough Darkwolf. I'd like to hear what he says. The evidence is still stacked to the side that says the towers shouldn't have collapsed IMO. The twin towers are the only steel structured buildings known to have collapsed from a fire. The jet fuel couldn't have lasted that long. An exploding airliner with close to full tanks would have had exploding fuel tanks turning the fuel into a vapor, which would have burned off quickly. The furnitrue, wall covering, paper etc. don't burn hot enough to melt or compromise a steel structure like the twin towers to the point of collapse within the short time it took them to collapse. WTC 7 was clearing "pulled" in a controlled demolition, and the managing partner (Larry Silverstein) of the entity that managed/owned the WTC complex clearly states as much in a PBS documentary "Rebuilding America." The north and south towers also appear to have been "pulled" in a controlled demolition after burning for a very short period of time. Thermite is the only thing I know of in my very limited knowledge of such things that could have accomplished this. There were pools of molten steel in the 7th basement of the two towers a few months after the attack. Normal combustables would have been smothered in this kind of oxygen starved environment. Thermite would not. Thanks for your input. Cary [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
9/11 Revisited Again
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top