Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
9/11 Revisited Again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BubbuClinton" data-source="post: 20093" data-attributes="member: 395"><p><strong>Re: 9/11 Revisited Again</strong></p><p></p><p>Zoomerz,</p><p></p><p>I agree it would be smarter to just fund a group of terrorist thugs to go kill themselves by hijacking a plane with box cutters. Of course there is the challenge of teaching them to fly and to aim the building without guidance into the 2 towers. Not to mention the magic 250 degree turn to hit the Pentagon at the right place.</p><p></p><p>I guess what I am looking for is what DOES the visual evidence really say? Some say they were black planes without windows, PM says they were 767's. Well, what does the evidence really say? I would like to know if there are any real pictures of commercial planes hitting the towers.</p><p></p><p>As for the collapse of the towers and building 7, we can go there next. Yes, that is a strange one.</p><p></p><p>If the planes were AA planes then we can rule out cover-up in the media, etc ... There are still nagging questions as to how it was done by the terrorist, etc ...</p><p></p><p>However, if they were black planes or something else, it shows a deep conspiracy. I know you think that if there is no reason to disbelieve what the official story is, don?t look for conspiracies. That would be easy to do, if I felt I could trust the Gov. If they would show direct evidence that Osama, Iraq, or who ever did it, I could swallow it better. Instead we just get statements from Orin Hatch, it was ?Osama of course?, or Condi Rice ? We have proof we will show that Osama did it?, great show it. But it never came. Just lame WND statements and Osama being the slipperiest Man in the East. The after math with political agendas, erosion of civil rights, etc ? has caused me to finally ask. What really happened? I want to see proof of what they said happened, happened.</p><p></p><p>Why, would they use black planes? Pretty stupid if they did, I agree. However, if they did, maybe they were ridged with the incendiary device to cause a big explosion.</p><p></p><p>I think there are 2 reasons for using "special planes" 1) the hijackers don't have to be miracle Pilots 2) you can start a big fire at the time of impact that will be a dramatic cover-up as to why the buildings fell. Didn't you see the fire?</p><p></p><p>So, I am interested in seeing the pictures. I guess I have a prurient interest of some sort. As for the missing people, I agree it is pretty sick to believe they landed the planes somewhere, blew them up and brought the bodies to the mortuary. But it could have happened.</p><p></p><p></p><p>StarLord,</p><p></p><p>Yes it was RickD at Anomalies. I am really not a bad guy when you get to know me. I just don't take kindly to statements like "There is no conspiracy because I say so, thread locked". I guess I was a little out of line when I posted that he was doing his own 911 cover-up. My bad.</p><p></p><p>About the Pentagon. I had the same question about missing debris. His article demonstrated damage to the pentagon and the grounds that was at least consistent with a plane the size of the 757. What they said happed was when the plane hit the building the wings sheared and the fuselage was forced through the reinforced steel and concrete through 9 walls. This basically shredded everything to tiny little bits. The whole in the building before the collapse was the right size for the body of the plane. When the wings sheared, they immediately bust into fire and completely disintegrated or burn to small pieces. Of course these pieces were conveniently picked up immediately afterwards by the FBI (not wearing gloves BTW). The story is at least plausible. In the law world it passes the straight face test. That is the test where you present your theory to the judge, and if he doesn't immediately start laughing at you, you can continue your case.</p><p></p><p>Bring forth the real evidence so we can see for our selves. The PM article just summarizes and doesn't ever back up their claims. Kinda like RickD saying, I saw the secret videos and it happened. It may be true. Now where are these videos?</p><p></p><p>Bubbu</p><p>_________________________</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BubbuClinton, post: 20093, member: 395"] [b]Re: 9/11 Revisited Again[/b] Zoomerz, I agree it would be smarter to just fund a group of terrorist thugs to go kill themselves by hijacking a plane with box cutters. Of course there is the challenge of teaching them to fly and to aim the building without guidance into the 2 towers. Not to mention the magic 250 degree turn to hit the Pentagon at the right place. I guess what I am looking for is what DOES the visual evidence really say? Some say they were black planes without windows, PM says they were 767's. Well, what does the evidence really say? I would like to know if there are any real pictures of commercial planes hitting the towers. As for the collapse of the towers and building 7, we can go there next. Yes, that is a strange one. If the planes were AA planes then we can rule out cover-up in the media, etc ... There are still nagging questions as to how it was done by the terrorist, etc ... However, if they were black planes or something else, it shows a deep conspiracy. I know you think that if there is no reason to disbelieve what the official story is, don?t look for conspiracies. That would be easy to do, if I felt I could trust the Gov. If they would show direct evidence that Osama, Iraq, or who ever did it, I could swallow it better. Instead we just get statements from Orin Hatch, it was ?Osama of course?, or Condi Rice ? We have proof we will show that Osama did it?, great show it. But it never came. Just lame WND statements and Osama being the slipperiest Man in the East. The after math with political agendas, erosion of civil rights, etc ? has caused me to finally ask. What really happened? I want to see proof of what they said happened, happened. Why, would they use black planes? Pretty stupid if they did, I agree. However, if they did, maybe they were ridged with the incendiary device to cause a big explosion. I think there are 2 reasons for using "special planes" 1) the hijackers don't have to be miracle Pilots 2) you can start a big fire at the time of impact that will be a dramatic cover-up as to why the buildings fell. Didn't you see the fire? So, I am interested in seeing the pictures. I guess I have a prurient interest of some sort. As for the missing people, I agree it is pretty sick to believe they landed the planes somewhere, blew them up and brought the bodies to the mortuary. But it could have happened. StarLord, Yes it was RickD at Anomalies. I am really not a bad guy when you get to know me. I just don't take kindly to statements like "There is no conspiracy because I say so, thread locked". I guess I was a little out of line when I posted that he was doing his own 911 cover-up. My bad. About the Pentagon. I had the same question about missing debris. His article demonstrated damage to the pentagon and the grounds that was at least consistent with a plane the size of the 757. What they said happed was when the plane hit the building the wings sheared and the fuselage was forced through the reinforced steel and concrete through 9 walls. This basically shredded everything to tiny little bits. The whole in the building before the collapse was the right size for the body of the plane. When the wings sheared, they immediately bust into fire and completely disintegrated or burn to small pieces. Of course these pieces were conveniently picked up immediately afterwards by the FBI (not wearing gloves BTW). The story is at least plausible. In the law world it passes the straight face test. That is the test where you present your theory to the judge, and if he doesn't immediately start laughing at you, you can continue your case. Bring forth the real evidence so we can see for our selves. The PM article just summarizes and doesn't ever back up their claims. Kinda like RickD saying, I saw the secret videos and it happened. It may be true. Now where are these videos? Bubbu _________________________ [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
9/11 Revisited Again
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top