Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
9/11 Revisited Again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Darkwolf" data-source="post: 20150" data-attributes="member: 177"><p><strong>Re: 9/11 Revisited Again</strong></p><p></p><p>Ok, I have to ask, why exactly would they hijack an airplane, shoot a missile into the pentagon, then say the plane hit it. Why not just hit it with the plane? If there is a conspiracy one must assume that they aren't stupid. They would not leave all of these loopholes in the story, besides its not like a plane firing a missile is exactly invisable from the ground. If so, where did the hijacked plane go? Why the added complexity? Clearly they could make passanger planes hit things There is no dispute about what hit the towers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Darkwolf, post: 20150, member: 177"] [b]Re: 9/11 Revisited Again[/b] Ok, I have to ask, why exactly would they hijack an airplane, shoot a missile into the pentagon, then say the plane hit it. Why not just hit it with the plane? If there is a conspiracy one must assume that they aren't stupid. They would not leave all of these loopholes in the story, besides its not like a plane firing a missile is exactly invisable from the ground. If so, where did the hijacked plane go? Why the added complexity? Clearly they could make passanger planes hit things There is no dispute about what hit the towers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
9/11 Revisited Again
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top