Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
A or B Theory
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="paradox404" data-source="post: 171901" data-attributes="member: 4523"><p>I understand exactly what you're saying. You're contradictory in saying that you believe the past exists but it doesn't.</p><p></p><p>Science is 90% guesswork and 10% fact. There's no technology currently capable of proving the past exists in the way you're describing, so you can't dismiss it's existence simply because no proof has been provided.</p><p></p><p>It's like being in the first world war and dismissing the possibility of weapons being invented that could destroy a city (Nukes.) I mean you have no proof a device could destroy an entire city, so it's impossible right? If it's impossible you should give it no consideration? Obviously we know, 100 years later that a view like that back then is considered foolish in hindsight. </p><p></p><p>Keep an open mind mate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="paradox404, post: 171901, member: 4523"] I understand exactly what you're saying. You're contradictory in saying that you believe the past exists but it doesn't. Science is 90% guesswork and 10% fact. There's no technology currently capable of proving the past exists in the way you're describing, so you can't dismiss it's existence simply because no proof has been provided. It's like being in the first world war and dismissing the possibility of weapons being invented that could destroy a city (Nukes.) I mean you have no proof a device could destroy an entire city, so it's impossible right? If it's impossible you should give it no consideration? Obviously we know, 100 years later that a view like that back then is considered foolish in hindsight. Keep an open mind mate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
A or B Theory
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top