Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
A Third Term For Apeman?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ZAROVE" data-source="post: 16192" data-attributes="member: 331"><p><strong>A Third Term For Apeman?</strong></p><p></p><p>Not only is this not relaly related to John titim ( whom im tryin o learn more baout, as I never heard the name before eysterday, and that on this forum) but its absird.</p><p></p><p></p><p>1: as noted, bush was elected in 200. even if you dont think he as, leglsaly he was and canot run another term.</p><p></p><p>2: A new amendment to allow the dissoluiton or extension of term limits is unlikely. The amendment to allow non-Natural Born citesens ( Like me) ha been proposed by BOTH partes over time, and is gianign suppor because peopel dont think tis irgh tot bar an american citesen form he office of president base don accedent of Birth location.</p><p></p><p>3: Bush sint totally evil. I mean, come on, he beats Kery, whow as a tewo facw hwo went wherever the wend blew, and was pro desturoyogn all our civil righs fredoms such as fredom of speech. ( I, incedentlaly, am opposed ot all forms of "Hate speech legilsation" because its a violation f the firts amendment, btu I digress...)</p><p></p><p> BNush is bette than KKerry because we knwo where he stands and, though he DID lie a few times eh lies les frewuenly than John Kerry.</p><p></p><p></p><p> The nation woidl be far, far worse under Kerry, in fact.</p><p></p><p></p><p>4: the party supporitng Bush is the rpeblicans, and though they get a bad rap form some, they aent toally evil. I am poliitclaly neutral, and personallu see plenty of fault with the democrats, and certianly tell you that the Bibels old saing " Get th ebeam out of thine own eye befoe thou removest he Mot form thy brotjers" is obviously illistrated here.</p><p></p><p> The dmeocrates and repulicans supported the Patriot act. Kery oted for it himself.</p><p></p><p> The domcrats impose hate speech and hate cirmes laws that are thinly veiwld attmets at eliminatign freedom of speech , association, and religion.</p><p></p><p> The democrates voted IN FAOVUR of the Iraqi war, this fgos also for Kerry.</p><p></p><p> so bashign hre republican party for this is pathetic.</p><p></p><p></p><p> I mean, relaly, who WHERE the peopel to vite for? Skeletor or Mum-Ra?</p><p></p><p></p><p>5: Bush sit totally evil. hes not the greatest leader we ever had, but he isnt ttlaly evil either.</p><p></p><p>6: Bush did NOT reate he evonomic mess w are in. we started the recesion under BilL clinton, NOT Bush. heck, they spoke of the recesison WHILE clinton wa sin his FIRST term. be reasonable. Bush sint the blame forht current economy, bad ecoomic policies under the clinton administration is.</p><p></p><p> That and the terrorist attakcs, which whwre p;anned while clinton wa sin office tnsks to our weaker military...</p><p></p><p></p><p>7: we are on a board o discuss time travel. Plenty of peole think we are wako to begin with. do we relaly need these insane conspiracy theories on Politics and paranoia abou trid temrs and amrtial law?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Thank you.</p><p></p><p></p><p> Before the spell ceck comments come, Im dyslexic. sorry.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ZAROVE, post: 16192, member: 331"] [b]A Third Term For Apeman?[/b] Not only is this not relaly related to John titim ( whom im tryin o learn more baout, as I never heard the name before eysterday, and that on this forum) but its absird. 1: as noted, bush was elected in 200. even if you dont think he as, leglsaly he was and canot run another term. 2: A new amendment to allow the dissoluiton or extension of term limits is unlikely. The amendment to allow non-Natural Born citesens ( Like me) ha been proposed by BOTH partes over time, and is gianign suppor because peopel dont think tis irgh tot bar an american citesen form he office of president base don accedent of Birth location. 3: Bush sint totally evil. I mean, come on, he beats Kery, whow as a tewo facw hwo went wherever the wend blew, and was pro desturoyogn all our civil righs fredoms such as fredom of speech. ( I, incedentlaly, am opposed ot all forms of "Hate speech legilsation" because its a violation f the firts amendment, btu I digress...) BNush is bette than KKerry because we knwo where he stands and, though he DID lie a few times eh lies les frewuenly than John Kerry. The nation woidl be far, far worse under Kerry, in fact. 4: the party supporitng Bush is the rpeblicans, and though they get a bad rap form some, they aent toally evil. I am poliitclaly neutral, and personallu see plenty of fault with the democrats, and certianly tell you that the Bibels old saing " Get th ebeam out of thine own eye befoe thou removest he Mot form thy brotjers" is obviously illistrated here. The dmeocrates and repulicans supported the Patriot act. Kery oted for it himself. The domcrats impose hate speech and hate cirmes laws that are thinly veiwld attmets at eliminatign freedom of speech , association, and religion. The democrates voted IN FAOVUR of the Iraqi war, this fgos also for Kerry. so bashign hre republican party for this is pathetic. I mean, relaly, who WHERE the peopel to vite for? Skeletor or Mum-Ra? 5: Bush sit totally evil. hes not the greatest leader we ever had, but he isnt ttlaly evil either. 6: Bush did NOT reate he evonomic mess w are in. we started the recesion under BilL clinton, NOT Bush. heck, they spoke of the recesison WHILE clinton wa sin his FIRST term. be reasonable. Bush sint the blame forht current economy, bad ecoomic policies under the clinton administration is. That and the terrorist attakcs, which whwre p;anned while clinton wa sin office tnsks to our weaker military... 7: we are on a board o discuss time travel. Plenty of peole think we are wako to begin with. do we relaly need these insane conspiracy theories on Politics and paranoia abou trid temrs and amrtial law? Thank you. Before the spell ceck comments come, Im dyslexic. sorry. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
A Third Term For Apeman?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top