Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Again with the Anthrax
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Judge Bean" data-source="post: 20735" data-attributes="member: 42"><p><strong>Re: Again with the Anthrax</strong></p><p></p><p>I would at least like to find out what Franks thinks about the condition of the Constitution; he seemed to be concerned that it was in some serious trouble, or vulnerable to it.</p><p></p><p>Also, I have noticed lately that the Bush administration every chance it gets puts the blame for the military situation in Iraq on Franks-- that, for instance, he underestimated the necessary troop strength and schedule of deployment. Rumsfeld recently came right out and blamed Franks on TV last weekend, and this follows the tendency of this bunch to try to blame others for their snafus. According to them, they never do anything wrong.</p><p> </p><p>I am partial to retired generals, and look back and see that they have done a decent job in the White House overall. Grant is an exception. I still like Colin Powell, also, and you see how they tried to make him a scapegoat as well.</p><p> </p><p>I think that retired generals are more apt to be nonpartisan and bring a fresh perspective to the job. I am fairly sick of presidents who talk big and are hawkish, but who know nothing of war first hand.</p><p> </p><p>....</p><p> </p><p>It looks like only about 40 States have write-in ballots for national elections, and there is an attempt now apparently to limit the device even narrower. </p><p> </p><p>Some States have requirements that as a practical matter force the candidate to have party affiliation with a high percentage of primary vote history.</p><p> </p><p>For many States, the only real way to avoid the bipartisan gridlock, or deathgrip, is to "qualify" for the ballot by petition. </p><p> </p><p>The Founding Fathers are turning over in their graves, of course, at the idea of "qualifying for a ballot."</p><p> </p><p>The apathy of the American people is so widespread that the very legend of their apathy is in danger of not being well enough known, the citizens being too apathetic to spread the legend. </p><p> </p><p>But I have faith in the people, and I think that if you can get 50 million people to say "wardrobe malfunction," or "if it doesn't fit, you must acquit," or "I've fallen and I can't get up," or "Where's the beef?" or "Just do it," or "Think out of the box," or "Push the envelope," or "24/7," or "guesstimate," you can certainly get near that number to write names on a ballot and put it in the slot without assistance or urging.</p><p> </p><p>Think of the alternatives... now, quick, perish the thought.</p><p> </p><p>Ten years from now, when you walk out your front door, or tent-flap, what will it look like out there?</p><p> </p><p>Are those pot-holes, or craters?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Judge Bean, post: 20735, member: 42"] [b]Re: Again with the Anthrax[/b] I would at least like to find out what Franks thinks about the condition of the Constitution; he seemed to be concerned that it was in some serious trouble, or vulnerable to it. Also, I have noticed lately that the Bush administration every chance it gets puts the blame for the military situation in Iraq on Franks-- that, for instance, he underestimated the necessary troop strength and schedule of deployment. Rumsfeld recently came right out and blamed Franks on TV last weekend, and this follows the tendency of this bunch to try to blame others for their snafus. According to them, they never do anything wrong. I am partial to retired generals, and look back and see that they have done a decent job in the White House overall. Grant is an exception. I still like Colin Powell, also, and you see how they tried to make him a scapegoat as well. I think that retired generals are more apt to be nonpartisan and bring a fresh perspective to the job. I am fairly sick of presidents who talk big and are hawkish, but who know nothing of war first hand. .... It looks like only about 40 States have write-in ballots for national elections, and there is an attempt now apparently to limit the device even narrower. Some States have requirements that as a practical matter force the candidate to have party affiliation with a high percentage of primary vote history. For many States, the only real way to avoid the bipartisan gridlock, or deathgrip, is to "qualify" for the ballot by petition. The Founding Fathers are turning over in their graves, of course, at the idea of "qualifying for a ballot." The apathy of the American people is so widespread that the very legend of their apathy is in danger of not being well enough known, the citizens being too apathetic to spread the legend. But I have faith in the people, and I think that if you can get 50 million people to say "wardrobe malfunction," or "if it doesn't fit, you must acquit," or "I've fallen and I can't get up," or "Where's the beef?" or "Just do it," or "Think out of the box," or "Push the envelope," or "24/7," or "guesstimate," you can certainly get near that number to write names on a ballot and put it in the slot without assistance or urging. Think of the alternatives... now, quick, perish the thought. Ten years from now, when you walk out your front door, or tent-flap, what will it look like out there? Are those pot-holes, or craters? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Again with the Anthrax
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top